EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 8 (2022) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 8 (2022) 29 References
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 8, 2022
Euratom Research and Training in 2022: challenges, achievements and future perspectives
Article Number 29
Number of page(s) 12
Section Part 1: Safety research and training of reactor systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2022026
Published online 09 November 2022
  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Advanced surveillance, diagnostic and prognostic techniques in monitoring structures, systems and components in nuclear power plants, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series, No. NP-T-3.14 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Pázsit, C. Demazière, Noise techniques in nuclear systems, in Handbook of Nuclear Engineering, edited by D. Cacuci (Springer, 2010), Vol. 3 [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Demazière, P. Vinai, M. Hursin, S. Kollias, J. Herb, Overview of the CORTEX project, in Proceeding of the International Conference on the Physics of Reactors – Reactor Physics paving the way towards more efficient systems (PHYSOR2018), Cancun, Mexico, April 22–26, 2018 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Durrant, G. Leontidis, S. Kollias, L.A. Torres, C. Montalvo, A. Mylonakis, C. Demazière, P. Vinai, Detection and localisation of multiple in-core perturbations with neutron noise-based self-supervised domain adaptation, in Proceedings of the International Conference in Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C2021), online, October 3–7, 2021 (American Nuclear Society, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Ioannou, T. Tasakos, A. Mylonakis, G. Alexandridis, C. Demazière, P. Vinai, A. Stafylopatis, Feature extraction and identification techniques for the alignment of perturbation simulations with power plant measurements, in Proceedings of the International Conference in Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C2021), online, October 3–7, 2021 (American Nuclear Society, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Tasakos, G. Ioannou, V. Verma, G. Alexandridis, A. Dokhane, A. Stafylopatis, Deep learning-based anomaly detection in nuclear reactor cores, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C2021), online, October 3–7, 2021 (American Nuclear Society, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Sanchez-Espinoza, S. Gabriel, H. Suikkanen, J. Telkkä, V. Valtavirta, The H2020 McSAFER project: main goals, technical work, program, and status, Energies 14, 6348 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. C.A. Cornell, Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58, 1583 (1968) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. R.P. Kennedy, C.A. Cornell, R.D. Campbell, S. Kaplan, H.F. Perla, Probabilistic seismic safety of an existing nuclear power plant, Nuclear Eng. Design 59, 315 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C.B. Haselton, J. Baker, J.P. Stewart, A. Whittaker, N. Luco, A. Fry, R. Hamburger, R. Zimmerman, Response-history analysis for the design of new buildings in the NEHRP provisions and ASCE/SEI 7 standard: Part I – overview and specification of ground motions, Earthq. Spectra 33, 373 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Blaesius, J. Herb, J. Sievers, A. Knospe, C. Lange, Modelling of FSIs for reactor vessel internals, CORTEX deliverable D1.2 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  12. Openquake platform https://platform.openquake.org/. [Google Scholar]
  13. Code_aster FEM code https://www.code-aster.org. [Google Scholar]
  14. B.W. Boehm, Software Engineering Economics (Prentice-Hall, Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1981) [Google Scholar]
  15. W.L. Oberkampf, T.G. Trucano, Verification and validation benchmarks, Nucl. Eng. Des. 238, 716 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. W.L. Oberkampf, T.G. Trucano, C. Hirsch, Verification, validation, and predictive capability in computational engineering and physics, Appl. Mech. Rev. 57, 345 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Ivanov, M. Avramova, S. Kamerow, I. Kodeli, E. Sartori, E. Ivanov, O. Cabellos, Benchmarks for Uncertainty Analysis in Modelling (UAM) for the design, operation and safety analysis of LWRs – Volume I: specification and support data for neutronics case (Phase I), report NEA/NSC/DOC(2013)7, OECD/NEA (2013) [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Demazière, A. Rouchon, A. Zoia, Understanding the neutron noise induced by fuel assembly vibrations in linear theory, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C2021), online, October 3–7, 2021 (American Nuclear Society, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Vinai, H. Yi, A. Mylonakis, C. Demazière, B. Gasse, A. Rouchon, A. Zoia, A. Vidàl-Ferràndiz, D. Ginestar, G. Verdú, T. Yamamoto, Comparison of neutron noise solvers based on numerical benchmarks in a 2-D simplified UOX fuel assembly, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C2021), online, October 3–7, 2021 (American Nuclear Society, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  20. V. Lamirand, A. Rais, S. Hübner, C. Lange, J. Pohlus, U. Paquee, C. Pohl, O. Pakari, P. Frajtag, D. Godat, M. Hursin, A. Laureau, G. Perret, C. Fiorina, A. Pautz, Neutron noise experiments in the AKR-2 and CROCUS reactors for the European project CORTEX, EPJ Web Conf. 225, 04023 (2020). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Vinai, K. Ambrozic, A. Brighenti, C. Demazière, B. Gasse, D. Ginestar, M. Hursin, S. Hübner, A. Knospe, V. Lamirand, C. Lange, A. Laureau, R. Macian, A. Mylonakis, O. Pakari, A. Rais, A. Rouchon, S. Santandrea, Z. Stankovski, G. Verdú, A. Vidal-Ferràndiz, T. Yamamoto, H. Yi, S. Yum, I. Zmijarevic, A. Zoia, Final validation report, CORTEX deliverable D2.5 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Kloos, E. Hofer, SUSA – PC, a personal computer version of the program system for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of results from computer models, version 3.2, User’s guide and tutorial, Gesellschaft für Anlagen-und Reaktorsicherheit, Garching, Germany (1999) [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Yum, R. Macian, P. Vinai, Methodology for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis, CORTEX deliverable D1.1 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Yum, M. Hursin, A. Vasiliev, P. Vinai, A.G. Mylonakis, C. Demazière, R. Macián-Juan, Uncertainty analyses of neutron noise simulations in a zero-power reactor, Ann. Nucl. Energy 174, 109157 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Tielinen, J. Telkkä, E. Kotro, V. Kouhia, H. Suikkanen, Description of the MOTEL facility and instrumentation, McSAFER deliverable 2.4, Helsinki (2021) [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Grishchenko, HWAT experimental setup and test matrix for first test series, McSAFER deliverable number 2.7, Stockholm (2021) [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Gabriel, G. Albrecht, W. Heiler, F. Heineken, COSMOS-H experimental setup and tests, McSAFER deliverable number 2.1, Karlsruhe (2021) [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Telkkä, A. Räsänen, E. Kotro, H. Suikkanen, Results of the MOTEL helical coil steam generator behaviour experiments, McSAFER deliverable number 2.5, Helsinki (2021) [Google Scholar]
  29. V. Ville, F. Anthime, F. Emil, L. Héctor, M. Luigi, Specifications for the reactivity transients scenarios in the four SMR cores, McSAFER deliverable number 3.1, Helsinki (2021) [Google Scholar]
  30. E. Fridman, D. Ferraro, V. Valtavirta, H. Lestani, L. Mercatali, R. Vocka, Y. Bilodid, M. Seidl, A. Fard, Group constant generation for the state-of-the-art codes, McSAFER deliverable number 3.2, Dresden (2021) [Google Scholar]
  31. E. Fridman, J. Blanco, H. Lestani, A. Farda, V. Valtavirtta, State-of-the-art solutions for the transient scenarios in the four SMR cores,McSAFER deliverable number 3.4, Karlsruhe (2022) [Google Scholar]
  32. L. Amiradable, et al., Analysis of NUSCALE plant with 1D system code and intercomparing between codes, McSAFER deliverable number 4.2 Petten (2022) [Google Scholar]
  33. TRACTEBEL, Analysis of SMART plant with 1D system TH Codes, McSAFER deliverable number 4.1, Brussels (2022) [Google Scholar]
  34. V. Jammot, N. Palmas, Status of WP4 and WP5 Tractebel Contributions, McSAFER Status Meeting WP4 and WP5, McSAFER, 20 July 2021 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Bencik, Multiscale RPV analysis methodologies for SMR, McSAFER Progress Meeting, McSAFER, 20 July 2021 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Grahn, CFD simulations of NuScale downcomer, McSAFER Progress Meeting on WPs 4 and 5, McSAFER 20 July 2021 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Böttcher, Analysis of stationary plant conditions of SMART with Ansys CFX, McSAFER internal report, Karlsruhe (2021) [Google Scholar]
  38. M. Korres, F. Lopez-Caballero, V. Alves Fernandes, F. Gatti, I. Zentner, F. Voldoire, D. Clouteau, D. Castro-Cruz, Enhanced seismic response prediction of critical structures via 3D regional scale physics-based earthquake simulation, J. Earthq. Eng. (2021), DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2021.2009061 [Google Scholar]
  39. I. Zentner, J. Berger, M. Caudron, An integrated approach for the transfer of seismic load from bedrock to the structure based on RVT and CMS, in Proceedings of the 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (17WCEE), September 27-October 2, 2021, Sendai, Japan (2021) [Google Scholar]
  40. A. Durrant, G. Leontidis, S. Kollias, 3D convolutional and recurrent neural networks for reactor perturbation unfolding and anomaly detection, EPJ Nucl. 5 20 (2019) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  41. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/plan-ai [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.