EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 6 (2020) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 6 (2020) 19 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 6, 2020
Article Number 19
Number of page(s) 22
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2020007
Published online 29 April 2020
  1. D.A. Brown et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 1 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. JEFF-3.3, https://www.oecd-nea.org/dbdata/jeff/jeff33/index.html, accessed on 1/11/2019 [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Shibata et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48, 1 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  4. Members of the Cross Sections Evaluation Working Group, Brookhaven National Laboratory Report No. BNL-90365-2009 Rev.2, 2012; edited by A. Trkov, M. Herman and D.A. Brown [Google Scholar]
  5. D.E. Vaughan et al., Los Alamos National Laboratory Report No. LA-UR-14-20441, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  6. W.P. Poenitz, Argonne National Laboratory Report No. ANL/NDM-139, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  7. S.A. Badikov et al., Int. Atomic Energy Agency Report STI/PUB/1291, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  8. W. Mannhart, IAEA Vienna Report INDC(NDS)-0588, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Bastian, in International Conference Neutrons in Research and Industry, Proc. SPIE 2867, 611 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Becker et al., Nuclear Energy Agency Report NEA/DB.DOC(2014)4, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Gunsing, Internal CEA Report DAPNIA/SPhN-98-37, 1998 [Google Scholar]
  12. N.M. Larson, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/TM-9179/R8ENDF-364/R2, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  13. N.M. Larson, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/TM-2008/104, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  14. C. De Saint Jean et al., in ND 2007, International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology 2007 (EDP Sciences, 2008), pp. 251–254 [Google Scholar]
  15. A.D. Carlson et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 143 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  16. A.D. Carlson et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 110, 3215 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Neudecker et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 163, 228 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. E.V. Gai, Int. Atomic Energy Agency Report No. INDC(NDS)-0750, 2018 [English translation of: E.V. Gai, Yadernye Konstanty 1–2, 56 (2007)] [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Capote et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 163, 191 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M.B. Chadwick et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 112, 2887 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. M.B. Chadwick et al., Nucl. Data Sheet 148, 189 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Briggs (Ed.), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development-Nuclear Energy Agency Report NEA/NSC/DOC(95)03, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Herman et al., OECD Nucl. Energy Agency Report No. NEA/NSC/WPEC/DOC(2010)427, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Neudecker et al., EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 4, 21 (2018) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Merla et al., in Proc. of Nuclear Data for Science and Technol., Jülich, 1991, p. 510 [Google Scholar]
  26. I.D. Alkhazov et al., in Proc. of Conf. of Nuclear Data for Sci. and Technol., Mito, 1988, p. 145 [Google Scholar]
  27. R. Alt et al., in Proc. of the Intern. Conf. for Nucl. Cross Sections for Technol., Knoxville, 1979, p. 990 [Google Scholar]
  28. G.W. Carlson et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 66, 205 (1978) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. P.H. White et al., J. Nucl. Energy 21, 671 (1967) [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Li et al., in Proc. of Conf. on Nucl. Data for Sci. and Technol., Antwerp, 1982, p. 55 [Google Scholar]
  31. Z. Xianjian et al., in Proc. of Nuclear Data for Sci. and Technol., Antwerp, 1982, p. 36 [Google Scholar]
  32. M.C. Davis et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 5, 569 (1978) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. I. Szabo et al., in Proc. of Meet. on Fast Neutr. Cross Sect. of U and Pu, Argonne, 1976, p. 208 [Google Scholar]
  34. I. Szabo et al., in Proc. of 3rd Conf. on Neutron Cross-Sections and Technol., Knoxville, 1971, Vol. 2, p. 573 [Google Scholar]
  35. I. Szabo et al., in Proc. of Neutron Standards Symp., Argonne, 1970, p. 257 [Google Scholar]
  36. J.L. Perkin et al., J. Nucl. Energy Paris A/B 19, 423 (1964) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Cance, G. Grenier, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 68, 197 (1978) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. W.D. Allen et al., Proc. Phys. Soc. A 70, 573 (1957) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. C.A. Uttley et al., AERE Report No. AERE-NP/R-1996, 1956 [Google Scholar]
  40. A. Moat, private communication, 1958 [Google Scholar]
  41. F. Tovesson et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 165, 224 (2010) (Pu-9) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. F. Tovesson et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 159, 94 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. J.W. Meadows, Argonne National Laboratory Report No. ANL/NDM-83, 1983 [Google Scholar]
  44. J.W. Meadows, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 68, 360 (1978) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. B.I. Fursov et al., Soviet Atomic Energy 43, 894 (1977) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. J.W. Meadows, Argonne National Laboratory Report No. ANL/NDM-97, 1986 [Google Scholar]
  47. J.W. Meadows, Argonne National Laboratory Report No. ANL/NDM-98, 1987 [Google Scholar]
  48. P. Staples et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 129, 149 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. E. Pfletschinger et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 40, 375 (1970) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. P.H. White et al., Int. Atomic Energy Agency Report No. STI/PUB/101/VOL.1, 1965, p. 219 [Google Scholar]
  51. K.D. Zhuravlev et al., Sov. J. Atomic Phys. 42, 62 (1977) [Google Scholar]
  52. L.W. Weston et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 84, 248 (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. P.W. Lisowksi et al., in Proc. of Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Mito, 1988, p. 97 [Google Scholar]
  54. P.W. Lisowksi et al., OECD Nucl. Energy Agency Report No. NEANDC-305, 1991, p. 177 [Google Scholar]
  55. A.D. Carlson, in Proc. of Nucl. Data for Sci. and Technol., Mito, 1988, p. 1029 [Google Scholar]
  56. K. Kari, Ph.D. thesis, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, GmbH, Karlsruhe, KfK 2673, 1978 [Google Scholar]
  57. D.B. Gayther et al., in Proc. of Panel on Neutron Standard Reference Data, Vienna, 1972, p. 201 [Google Scholar]
  58. D.B. Gayther et al., in Proc. of Conference on Nucl. Cross-sections and Technology, Washington, 1975, Vol. 2, p. 564 [Google Scholar]
  59. O. Shcherbakov et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2, 230 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. M. Mahdavi et al., in Proc. of the Conf. on Nucl. Data for Science and Technol., Antwerp, 1982, p. 58 [Google Scholar]
  61. W.P. Poenitz, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 40, 383 (1970) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. I. Garlea et al., Rev. Roumaine Phys. 29, 421 (1984) [Google Scholar]
  63. M. Várnagy et al., Nucl. Instr. Methods 96, 465 (1982) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. R.H. Iyer et al., in Proc. of the Conf. on Nucl. and Solid State Physics Symp., Roorkee, 1969, Vol. 2, 289 [Google Scholar]
  65. L.W. Weston et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 111, 415 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. L.W. Weston et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 88, 567 (1984) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. A.A. Bergman et al., Int. Atomic Energy Agency Report No. INDC(CCP)-169, 1980, p. 54 [Google Scholar]
  68. C. Wagemans et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 7, 495 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. J. Blons, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 51, 130 (1973) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. L.W. Weston et al., Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 15, 480 (1972) [Google Scholar]
  71. R. Gwin et al., Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 15, 481 (1972) [Google Scholar]
  72. R. Gwin et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 59, 79 (1976) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. G.D. James, in Proc. of Nucl. Data for Reactors Conf., Helsinki, 1970, Vol. 1, p. 267 [Google Scholar]
  74. M.G. Schomberg, in Proc. of Nucl. Data for Reactors Conf., Helsinki, 1970, Vol. 1, p. 315 [Google Scholar]
  75. R. Gwin et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 45, 25 (1971) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  76. R. Gwin et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 40, 306 (1970) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  77. R.E. Coté et al., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 1, 187 (K5) (1965) [Google Scholar]
  78. Yu.V. Ryabov, Atom. Energ. 46, 154 (1979) [Google Scholar]
  79. W.K. Lehto, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 39, 361 (1970) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  80. B. Adams et al., J. Nucl. Energy A& B 14, 85 (1961) [Google Scholar]
  81. D. Neudecker et al., Los Alamos National Laboratory Report No. LA-UR-18-20767, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  82. R. Capote et al., J. ASTM Int. 9, JAI 104119 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  83. D.L. Smith, in Proc. of AccApp’07, Pocatello, 2007, p. 736 [Google Scholar]
  84. M.E. Rising et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 175, 81 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  85. C. Gorlé et al., Phys. Fluids 31, 035101 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  86. D. Neudecker et al., Nucl. Data Sheets, submitted (2020) [Google Scholar]
  87. E.J. Axton, Central Bureau for Nuclear Measurements Geel Report GE/PH/01/86, 1986 [Google Scholar]
  88. L. Salamon et al., Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. B 446, 19 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  89. P. Talou et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 166, 254 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  90. D. Neudecker et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 293 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.