EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 8 (2022) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 8 (2022) 9 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 8, 2022
Article Number 9
Number of page(s) 16
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2022007
Published online 21 June 2022
  1. J. Rhodes, K. Smith, D. Lee, CASMO-5 development and applications, in Proceedings of the PHYSOR-2006 conference, ANS Topical Meeting on Reactor Physics, Vancouver, BC, Canada, September 10-14, Vancouver, BC, Canada, September 10-14 (2006), p. B144 [Google Scholar]
  2. U. Mertyurek, M.W. Francis, I.C. Gauld, SCALE 5 Analysis of BWR Spent Nuclear Fuel Isotopic Compositions for Safety Studies, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report, ORNL/TM-2010/286 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, M. Hursin, Analysis for the ARIANE GU1 sample: nuclide inventory and decay heat, Ann. Nucl. Energy 160, 108359 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, M. Hursin, R. Ichou, J. Taforeau, T. Simeonov, Analysis for the ARIANE GU3 sample: nuclide inventory and decay heat, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 7, 14 (2021) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, M. Hursin, Analysis for the ARIANE BM1 and BM3 samples: nuclide inventory and decay heat, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol 7, 18 (2021) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. H.J. Smith, I.C. Gauld, U. Mertyurek, Analysis of Experimental Data for High Burnup BWR Spent Fuel Iso-topic Validation - SVEA-96 and GE14 Assembly Designs, Oak Ridge National Laboratory report NUREg/cR-7162, ORNL/TM-2013/18 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  7. I.C. Gauld, U. Mertyurek, Validation of BWR spent nuclear fuel isotopic predictions with applications to burnup credit, Nucl. Eng. Des. 345, 110 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Alejano, J.M. Conde, M. Quecedo, M. Lloret, J.A. Gago, P. Zuloaga, F.J. Fernandez, PWR and BWR Fuel Assay Data Measurements, International Workshop on Advances in Applications of Burnup Credit for Spent Fuel Storage, Transport, Reprocessing and Disposition, Cordoba, Spain (October 2009) [Google Scholar]
  9. European Joint Programme on Radioactive Waste Management, EU H2020-Euratom-1.2 program, Grant agreement ID: 847593, https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/847593 [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Munoz, Specification of measured isotopic concentrations of BWR Spent Fuel, October 26, 2020, ENRESA report INF-TD-010032 Revision 1 [Google Scholar]
  11. J.M. Conde, C. Alejano, J.M. Rey, Nuclear fuel research activities of the Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear, Top Fuel 2006, International Meeting on LWR fuel Performance Nuclear Fuel: Addressing the Future, 22-26 October 2006 Salamanca, Spain, p. 107, https://euronuclear.info/events/topfuel/transactions/Topfuel-Technical-Session.pdf [Google Scholar]
  12. I.C. Gauld, U. Mertyurek, Margins for Uncertainty in the Predicted Spent Fuel Isotopic Inventories for BWR Burnup Credit, Oak Ridge National Laboratory report, NUREG/CR-7251 and ORNL/TM-2018/782 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  13. J.S. Martinez, B.J. Ade, S.M. Bowman, I.C. Gauld, G. Ilas, W.J. Marshall, Impact of modeling choices and inventory and in-cask criticality calculations for Forsmark 3 BWR Spent Fuel, International conference on nuclear criticality safety, ICNC 2015, Charlotte, NC, USA, 13-17 September 2015, p. 14 [Google Scholar]
  14. D.E. Mueller, S.M. Bowman, W.J. Marshall, J.M. Scaglione, Review and Prioritization of Technical Issues Related to Burnup Credit for BWR Fuel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, February 1973, NUREG/CR-7158 and ORNL/TM-2012/261 [Google Scholar]
  15. E.L. Georgieva, J. Hykes, R.M. Ferrer, J. Rhodes, CASMO5 isotopic comparison to the ARIANE mixed-oxide pressurized water spent fuel measurements, in Proceedings of the PHYSOR 2018 conference: Reactor Physics paving the way towards more efficient systems, Cancun, Mexico, April 22-26, 2018 (2018), p. 1171. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Brovchenko, J. Taforeau, Pin power calculation scheme for reactor pressure vessel fast neutron fluence estimation, EPJ Web Confer. 247, 02029 (2021) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Li, D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, J. Herrero, A. Pautz, M. Seidl, D. Janin, Bowing effects on isotopic concentrations for simplified PWR assemblies and full cores, Ann. Nucl. Energy 110, 547 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Rochman, P. Mala, H. Ferroukhi, A. Vasiliev, M. Seidl, D. Janin, J. Li, Bowing effects on power and burn-up distributions for simplified full PWR and BWR cores, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M & C), Jeju, Korea, April 16-20, 2017, on USB (2017) [Google Scholar]
  19. B.T. Bearden, M.A. Jessee, SCALE Code System, ORNL/TM-2005/39 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Shama, D. Rochman, S. Caruso, A. Pautz, Validation of spent nuclear fuel decay heat calculations using Polaris, ORIGEN and CASMO5, Ann. Nucl. Energy 165, 108758 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. D.A. Brown et al., ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data, Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 1 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A.J.M. Plompen et al., The joint evaluated fission and fusion nuclear data library, JEFF-3.3, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 181 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. K. Shibata et al., JENDL-4.0: a new library for nuclear science and engineering, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48, 1 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. W. Wieselquist, T. Zhu, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, PSI methodologies for nuclear data uncertainty propagation with CASMO-5M and MCNPX: results for OECD/NEA UAM Bench-mark Phase I, Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 2013, 549793 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  25. O. Leray, H. Ferroukhi, M. Hursin, A. Vasiliev, D. Rochman, Methodology for core analyses with nuclear data uncertainty quantification and application to swiss PWR operated cycles, Ann. Nuclear Energy 110, 547 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. S.D. Phillips, K.R. Eberhardt, B. Parry, Guidelines for expressing the uncertainty of measurement results containing uncorrected bias, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 102, 577 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, M. Seidl, J. Basualdo, Improvement of PIE analysis with a full core simulation: the U1 case, Ann. Nucl. Energy 148, 107706 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Simeonov, CMS5/SNF Validation Isotopic analyses of UOX samples irradiated in BWR Forsmark 3, Studsvik report, SSP-19/402 Revision 0, December 201, Studsvik report, SSP-19/402 Revision 0, December 2018 8 [Google Scholar]
  29. F. Jatuff, F. Giust, J. Krouthen, S. Helmersson and R. Chawla, Effects of void uncertainties on the void reactivity coefficient and pin power distributions for a 10 x 10 BWR assembly, Ann. Nucl. Energy 33, 119 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. G. Windecker, H. Anglart, Phase distribution in a BWR fuel assembly and evaluation of a multidimensional multifield model, Nucl. Technol. 134, 49 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.