EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 6 (2020) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 6 (2020) 52 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 6, 2020
Article Number 52
Number of page(s) 17
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2020015
Published online 28 August 2020
  1. O. Leray et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 94, 603 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J.S. Martinez et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 480 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Mills, Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 484 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Sjöstrand et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 527 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. H. Ferroukhi et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 498 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. O. Leray et al., Prog. Nucl. Energy 101, 486 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Ilas, H. Liljenfeldt, Nucl. Eng. Des. 319, 176 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J.J. Herrero et al., EPJ Web Conf. 146, 09028 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Fiorito et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 88, 12 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Pigni et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 123, 231 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Terranova et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 109, 469 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. K.H. Schmidt et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 131, 107 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  13. K.H. Schmidt, B. Jurado, C. Amouroux, Nuclear Energy Agency Data Bank NEA/DB/DOC(2014)1 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Schmitt et al., Phys. Rev. C 98, 044605 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K.H. Schmidt, B. Jurado, Rep. Progr. Phys. 81, 106301 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J.C. Wagner, Sandia National Laboratory TWP-EBS-MD-000019, Rev. 01 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Siefman et al., EPJ Plus 130, 429 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Rochman et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 95, 125 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Frosio et al., EPJ Nucl. Sci. Technol. 4, 19 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Rizzo et al., EPJ Nucl. Sci. Technol. 4, 47 (2018) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Palmiotti et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 123, 41 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Rhodes et al., Studsvik Scandpower, Inc SSP-07/431 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Murphy et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 33, 760 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Grimm, et al., Prog. Nucl. Energy 101, 280 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Hoefer et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 77, 514 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Bauge, S. Hilaire, P. Dossantos-Uzarralde, Proceedings of ND2007 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Salvatores et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 38 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Siefman, et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 135, 106951 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. R. Capote et al., J. ASTM Int. 9, 1 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  30. G. Schnabel, PhD thesis, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna (2015) [Google Scholar]
  31. H. Leeb, D. Neudecker, T. Srdinko, Nucl. Data Sheets 109, 2762 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Neudecker, R. Capote, H. Leeb, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 723, 163 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  33. D. Siefman, PhD thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland (2019) [Google Scholar]
  34. H. Sjöstrand et al., Proceedings of WONDER2018 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  35. B. Carlin, T. Louis, Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis, 2nd edn. (Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. A.J.M. Plompen et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 181 (2020) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  37. K. Kern, PhD thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany (2018) [Google Scholar]
  38. K.H. Schmidt, GEF2017/1.1: General description of fission observables. released September 24, 2017., http://www.khs-erzhausen.de/GEF-2017-1-1.html (accessed: May 30, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  39. D. Rochman et al., Annals of Nuclear Energy 112, 236 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. J. Dragt et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 62, 117 (1977) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. A. Pazy et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 55, 280 (1974) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. E. Alhassan et al., Prog. Nucl. Energy 88, 43 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. D. Rochman et al., EPJ Plus 133, 537 (2018) [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  44. M.L. Williams et al., SCALE: A Comprehensive Modeling and Simulation Suite for Nuclear Safety Analysis and Design,ORNL/TM-2005/39, Version 6.1 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  45. P. Helgesson, PhD thesis, Uppsala University, Sweden (2018) [Google Scholar]
  46. G. Schnabel, Proceedings of M&C 2017 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  47. M. Chadwick et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 112, 2887 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. W. Wieselquist et al., Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations p. 549793 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  49. M. Hursin et al., Proceedings of PHYSOR2016 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  50. A. Aures et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 101, 262 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. M. Hursin et al., Proceedings of PHYSOR2018 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  52. M. Pecchia et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 97, 153 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. S. Shapiro, M. Wilk, Biometrika 52, 591 (1965) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  54. B. Efron, R. Tibshirani, Stat. Sci. 1, 54 (1986) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. F. Michel-Sendis et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 110, 779 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. I. Gauld et al., Nucl. Eng. Technol. 49, 1226 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.