Corrigendum to: The 0E2 benchmarks for PWR UO2 decay heat: an analysis from the NEA WPNCS

Dimitri A. Rochman; Francisco Alvarez-Velarde; Kelsey Amundson; John Bess; Sébastien Bonthoux; Oscar Cabellos; Coralie Carmouze; Shahab Dabiran-Zohoory; Ron Dagan; Luca Fiorito; Juan García; Lydie Giot; Fernando Gomez Salcedo; Volker Hannstein; Silja Häkkinen; Mathieu Hursin; Raphaelle Ichou; Fredrik Johansson; Pauli Juutilainen; Marjan Kromar; Sébastien Lahaye; Agnès Launay; Vincent Léger; Robert W. Mills; Ugur Mertyurek; Pedro Ortego; Sofia Portolan; Miiko Pöyhönen; Germina Procop; Pablo Romojaro; Benjamin Ruprecht; Bishal Torrente; Sven Tittelbach; Shunsuke Sato; Ahmed Shama; Teodosi Simeonov; Virginie Solans; Vanessa Vallet; Alexander Vasiliev; Gasper Žerovnik

doi:10.1051/epjn/2026014

All issues

Volume 12 (2026)

EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 12 (2026) 22

Abstract

Open Access

Erratum

This article is an erratum for:
[https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2026011]

Issue		EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. Volume 12, 2026


Article Number		22
Number of page(s)		1
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2026014
Published online		16 July 2026

EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 12, 22 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2026014

Corrigendum

Corrigendum to: The 0E2 benchmarks for PWR UO₂ decay heat: an analysis from the NEA WPNCS

Dimitri A. Rochman¹^,26^*, Francisco Alvarez-Velarde², Kelsey Amundson³, John Bess⁴, Sébastien Bonthoux⁵, Oscar Cabellos⁶, Coralie Carmouze⁷, Shahab Dabiran-Zohoory³, Ron Dagan⁸, Luca Fiorito⁹, Juan García², Lydie Giot¹⁰, Fernando Gomez Salcedo¹¹, Volker Hannstein¹², Silja Häkkinen¹⁴, Mathieu Hursin¹⁵, Raphaelle Ichou⁵, Fredrik Johansson¹⁶, Pauli Juutilainen¹⁴, Marjan Kromar¹⁷, Sébastien Lahaye¹⁸, Agnès Launay¹⁹, Vincent Léger²⁰, Robert W. Mills²¹, Ugur Mertyurek²², Pedro Ortego²⁴, Sofia Portolan¹, Miiko Pöyhönen¹⁴, Germina Procop²², Pablo Romojaro⁹, Benjamin Ruprecht¹³, Bishal Torrente¹, Sven Tittelbach¹², Shunsuke Sato²³, Ahmed Shama²², Teodosi Simeonov²⁵, Virginie Solans²⁶, Vanessa Vallet⁷, Alexander Vasiliev¹ and Gasper Žerovnik¹³

¹ Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
² Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid, Spain
³ OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), Paris, France
⁴ JFoster & Associates, LLC (JFA), Idaho Falls, ID, USA
⁵ Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Authority (ASNR), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
⁶ Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain
⁷ Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Cadarache, France
⁸ Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
⁹ Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
¹⁰ Subatech (CNRS/IN2P3, IMT Atlantique, Université de Nantes), Nantes, France
¹¹ ENRESA, Madrid, Spain
¹² Gesellschaft für Zwischenlagerung (BGZ), Essen, Germany
¹³ Bundesamt für die Sicherheit der nuklearen Entsorgung (BASE), Salzgitter, Germany
¹⁴ VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT), Espoo, Finland
¹⁵ EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
¹⁶ Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB (SKB), Solna, Sweden
¹⁷ Jožef Stefan Institute (JSI), Ljubljana, Slovenia
¹⁸ Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Saclay, France
¹⁹ ORANO, Beaumont Hague, France
²⁰ ORANO, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
²¹ National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL), Seascale, UK
²² Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN, USA
²³ Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Nagasaka, Japan
²⁴ Science Engineering Associates, Madrid, Spain
²⁵ Studsvik Scandpower, Inc., Newton, MA, USA
²⁶ Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland

^* e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

This article has no abstract.

Erratum for: EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 12, 20 (2026) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2026011

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

First page of the article