EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 12 (2026) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 12 (2026) 12 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 12, 2026
Article Number 12
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2026007
Published online 13 May 2026
  1. C. Introïni, I. Ramière, J. Sercombe, B. Michel, T. Helfer, J. Fauque, ALCYONE: the fuel performance code of the PLEIADES platform dedicated to PWR fuel rods behavior, Ann. Nucl. Energy 207, 110711 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2024.110711 [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Michel, J. Sercombe, G. Thouvenin, R. Chatelet, 3D fuel cracking modelling in pellet cladding mechanical interaction, in Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Local Approach to Fracture (1986-2006): Selected papers from the 9th European Mechanics of Materials Conference (2008), Vol. 75, pp. 3581–3598, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.014 [Google Scholar]
  3. L.O. Jernkvist, A review of analytical criteria for fission gas induced fragmentation of oxide fuel in accident conditions, Prog. Nucl. Energy 119, 103188 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103188 [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Kulacsy, Mechanistic model for the fragmentation of the high-burnup structure during LOCA, J. Nucl. Mater. 466, 409 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.015 [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Michel, M. Welland, N. Ofori-Opoku, L. Vanbrutzel, K. Kulacsy, M.R. Tonks, P.-G. Vincent, F. Ribeiro, A. Jelea, G. Pastore, D.A. Anderson, J. Gatt, R. Madec, J.-P. Crocombette, State of the art of fuel micro-mechanical modelling: From atomic scale to engineering laws in fuel performance codes, J. Nucl. Mater. 572, 154034 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.154034 [Google Scholar]
  6. A.A. Griffith, The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 221, 163 (1921), https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1921.0006 [Google Scholar]
  7. Z.P. Bazant, Size effect, Int. J. Solids Struct. 37, 69 (2000), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00077-3 [Google Scholar]
  8. G.I. Barenblatt, The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle fracture. General ideas and hypotheses. Axially-symmetric cracks, J. Appl. Math. Mech. 23, 622 (1959), https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8928(59)90157-1 [Google Scholar]
  9. D.S. Dugdale, Yielding of steel sheets containing slits, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 8, 100 (1960), https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Henry, I. Zacharie-Aubrun, T. Blay, S. Chalal, J.-M. Gatt, C. Langlois, S. Meille, Fracture properties of an irradiated PWR UO2 fuel evaluated by micro-cantilever bending tests, J. Nucl. Mater. 538, 152209 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152209 [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Henry, I. Zacharie-Aubrun, T. Blay, N. Tarisien, S. Chalal, X. Iltis, J.-M. Gatt, C. Langlois, S. Meille, Irradiation effects on the fracture properties of UO2 fuels studied by micro-mechanical testing, J. Nucl. Mater. 536, 152179 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152179 [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Gong, D. Frazer, B. Shaffer, H.C. Lim, P. Hosemann, P. Peralta, Micro-cantilever beam experiments and modeling in porous polycrystalline UO2, J. Nucl. Mater. 557, 153210 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153210 [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Balboa, L. Van Brutzel, A. Chartier, Y. Le Bouar, Assessment of empirical potential for MOX nuclear fuels and thermomechanical properties, J. Nucl. Mater. 495, 67 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.07.067 [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Zhang, X.-Y. Liu, P.C. Millett, M. Tonks, D.A. Andersson, B. Biner, Crack tip plasticity in single crystal UO2: Atomistic simulations, J. Nucl. Mater. 430, 96 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.06.044 [Google Scholar]
  15. Z.A. Manorosoa, A. Chrysochoos, A. Jelea, Y. Monerie, F. Perales, Atomistic study of the properties and behavior under uniaxial tensile stress of some representative UO2 grain boundaries, Comput. Mater. Sci. 228, 11231 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112314 [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Bourdin, G.A. Francfort, J.-J. Marigo, The Variational Approach to Fracture (Springer Netherlands, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Linse, P. Hennig, M. Kästner, R. de Borst, A convergence study of phase-field models for brittle fracture, Eng. Fract. Mech. 184, 307 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Tanne, T. Li, B. Bourdin, J.-J. Marigo, C. Maurini, Crack nucleation in variational phase-field models of brittle fracture. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 110, 80 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Molnar, A. Doitrand, A. Jaccon, B. Prabel, A. Gravouil, Thermodynamically consistent linear-gradient damage model in Abaqus. Eng. Fract. Mech. 266, 108390 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Jiménez-Alfaro, D. Leguillon, C. Maurini, J. Reinoso, A dialogue between Finite Fracture Mechanics and Phase Field approaches to fracture for predicting crack nucleation at the microscale, Int. J. Fract. 249, 13 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-024-00819-x [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Leguillon, Strength or toughness? A criterion for crack onset at a notch, European JMech. 21, 61 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0997-7538(01)01184-6 [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Weißgraeber, D. Leguillon, W. Becker, A review of finite fracture mechanics: crack initiation at singular and nonsingular stress raisers, Arch. Appl. Mech. 86, 375 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Doitrand, T. Duminy, H. Girard, X. Chen, A review of the coupled criterion. J. Theor. Comput. Appl. Mech. (2024), https://doi.org/10.46298/jtcam.11072 [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Doitrand, E. Martin, D. Leguillon, Numerical implementation of the coupled criterion: Matched asymptotic and full finite element approaches, Finite Elements Anal. Design 168, 103344 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2019.103344 [Google Scholar]
  25. V. Acary, Y. Monerie, Nonsmooth fracture dynamics using a cohesive zone approach, Research Report RR-6032, INRIA, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Martin, T. Vandellos, D. Leguillon, N. Carrere, Initiation of edge debonding: coupled criterion versus cohesive zone model, Int. J. Fract. 199, 157 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Turon, C. G. Dávila, P. P. Camanho, J. Costa, An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 74, 1665 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Doitrand, R. Estevez, D. Leguillon, Comparison between cohesive zone and coupled criterion modeling of crack initiation in rhombus hole specimens under quasi-static compression, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 99, 51 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  29. T.L. Anderson, Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, 4th edn. (CRC Press, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  30. Cast3M Finite Element code, G_THETA : The crack virtual extension procedure, https://www-cast3m.cea.fr/ [Google Scholar]
  31. N. Blal, L. Daridon, Y. Monerie, S. Pagano, Micromechanical-based criteria for the calibration of cohesive zone parameters, J. Comput. Appl. Math., Fifth International Conference on Advanced COmputational Methods in ENgineering (ACOMEN 2011) 246, 206 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2012.10.031 [Google Scholar]
  32. B. Michel, T. Helfer, I. Ramiere, C. Esnoul, A new numerical methodology for simulation of unstable crack growth in time independent brittle materials, Eng. Fract. Mech. 188, 126 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Doitrand, R. Henry, I. Zacharie-Aubrun, J.-M. Gatt, S. Meille, UO2 micron scale specimen fracture: Parameter identification and influence of porosities, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 108, 102665 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102665 [Google Scholar]
  34. J.B. Wachtman, M.L. Wheat, H.J. Anderson, J.L. Bates, Elastic constants of single crystal UO2 at 25°C, J. Nucl. Mater. 16, 39 (1965), https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(65)90089-9 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.