Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 10, 2024
Article Number 18
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2024019
Published online 28 November 2024
  1. M. Livolant, F. Jeanpierre, Autoprotection des resonances dans les réacteurs nucléaires, CEA Repport CEA-R-4533, CEA Saclay, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Tsuchihashi et al., J. Nucl. SCi. Techno. 22, 16 (1985) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Sanchez, G.C. Pomraning, Ann. Nucl. Energ. 18, 371 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Hebert, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 115, 177 (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Chambon et al., An improved double heterogeneity model for pebble-bed reactors in DRAGON-5, in Proc. Int. Conf. PHYSOR 2020 Transition to a scalable Nuclear Future, (Cambrige, UK, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Lei et al., Front. Energy Res. 9, 773067 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Mazzolo, Quelques aspects des simulations des systemes moléculaires aux geometries stochastiques des réacteurs a boulets (HDR, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  8. D.R. Reinert, Investigation of stochastic radiation transport method in random heterogeneous mixtures, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas, Austin, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Park et al., Ann. Nucl. Energ. 172, 109060 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Yuan et al., Ann. Nucl. Energ. 190, 109894 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. T.Y. Han, H.C. Lee, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 55, 749 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Chaucheprat, Qualification du calcul des poisons consomables au gadolinium dans les réacteurs à eau, Ph.D. thesis, Paris-Sud University, Orsay, 1988 [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Hentati, Interprétation d’expérience dans le réacteur MINERVE pour la qualification du gadolinium, private communication, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Yamamoto, Prog. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 4, 404 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. D.D. DiJulio et al., Rad. Phys. Chem. 147, 40 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Becker et al., Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129, 58 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. C.D. Levermore et al., J. Math. Phys. 27, 2526 (1986) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. W.B. Doub, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 10, 299 (1961) [Google Scholar]
  19. M.C. Moxon, J.B. Brisland, Report AEA-InTec-0630, AEA Technology, 1991 [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Brun et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 65, 151 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Noguere, J.Ch. Sublet, Ann. Nucl. Energ. 35, 2259 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. K.M. Case et al., introduction to the Theory of Neutron Diffusion (Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, USA, 1953), Vol. 1, pp. 28 [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Balestrieri, A study of the UO2/Gd2O3 composite fuel, in Proc. of a Technical Committee Meeting on Advances in Fuel Pellet Technology for Improved Performance at High Burnup, IAEA-TECDOC-1036 (Tokyo, Japan, 1996) [Google Scholar]
  24. F. Rocchi et al., EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 3, 21 (2017) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. A.J.M. Plompen et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 181 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Salamon et al., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 321, 519 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. B. Becker et al., J. Instrum. 7, 11002 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  28. P. Schillebeeckx et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 113, 3054 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Schillebeeckx et al., Neutron resonance spectroscopy for teh characterisation of materials and objects, JRC science and policy repport, JRC-Geel, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  30. F. Ma et al., J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 35, 478 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.