Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 8, 2022
Fuel Cycle Simulation TWoFCS 2021
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2022002
Published online 25 May 2022
  1. Loi n°91-1381 du 30 décembre 1991 relative aux recherches sur la gestion des déchets radioactifs, 1991 [Google Scholar]
  2. Loi n° 2006-739 du 28 juin2006 de programme relative à la gestion durable des matières et déchets radioactifs, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ministère de la transition écologique et solidaire, Programmation Pluriannuelle de l'Energie, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Sciora, L. Buiron, G. Rimpault, F. Varaine, A break even oxide fuel core for an innovative SFR: CEA neutronic studies, in Proceedings of the Global 2009 conference, Paris, France (2009) [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Sciora, D. Blanchet, L. Buiron, B. Fontaine, M. Vanier, F. Varaine, C. Venard, S. Massara, A.-C. Scholer, D. Verrier, Low void effect core design applied on 2400 MWth SFR reactor, in Proceedings of the ICAPP 2011 conference, Nice, France 5, 1 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Languille, J. Garnier, P. Lo Pinto, CAPRA core studies − The oxide Reference Option, in Proceedings of the Global 1995 conference, Versailles, France (1995) [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Zaetta, B. Fontaine, P. Sciora, R. Lavastre, R. Jacqmin, V. Pascal, M. Pelletier, G. Mignot, A. Jankowiak, CADOR “Core with Adding DOppleR effect” concept application to sodium fast reactors, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 5, 1 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Coquelet-Pascal, M. Tiphine, G. Krivtchik, D. Freynet, C. Cany, R. Eschbach, C. Chabert, COS I6: a tool for nuclear transition scenario studies and application to SFR deployment scenarios with minor actinide transmutation, Nucl. Technol. 192, 91–110 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Kooyman, P. Sciora, C. Coquelet-Pascal, Some considerations on the design of a small versatile fast reactor, in Proceedings of the ICAPP 2019 conference, Juan-les-pins, France (2019) [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Krivtchik, Analysis of unvertainty propagation in nuclear fuel cycle scenarios, PhD thesis, Université de Grenoble, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Freynet, Développement d'une méthodologie pour l'optimisation multicritère de scénarios d'évolution du parc nucléaire, PhD thesis, Université de Grenoble, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Ammar, Conception multi-physique et multi-objectif des coeurs de RNR-Na hétérogènes: développement d'une méthode d'optimisation sous incertitudes, PhD thesis, Université Paris-Sud 11, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  13. O. Fabbris, Optimisation multi-physique et multi-critère des coeurs de RNR-Na: application au concept CFV, PhD thesis, Université de Grenoble, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Kooyman, Amélioration des performances de transmutation des actinides mineurs dans les réacteurs de quatrième génération: aspects cycle et coeurs, PhD thesis, Université d'Aix-Marseille, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Ernoult, X. Doligez, N. Thiollière, A. Zakari-Issoufou, A. Bidaud, S. Bouneau, J. Clavel, F. Courtin, S. David, A. Somaini, Global and flexible models for Sodium-cooled Fast Reactors in fuel cycle simulations, Ann. Nucl. Energy 1128, 69–76 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J.-B. Blanchard, G. Damblin, J.-M. Martinez, G. Arnaud, F. Gaudier, The URANIE platform: an open-source software for optimisation, meta-modelling and uncertainty analysis, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 5, 4 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Ruggieri, J. Tommasi, J. Lebrat, C. Suteau, D. Plisson-Rieunier, G. Rimpault, J. Sublet, ERANOS 2.1: International Code System for GEN IV Fast Reactor, in Proceedings of the ICAPP 2006 conference, Reno, Nevada, USA (2006) [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Koning, R. Forrest, M. Kellett, R. Mills, H. Henriksson, Y. Rugama, The JEFF-3.1 Nuclear Data Library, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Martin, C. Coquelet-Pascal, Symbiotic equilibrium between sodium fast reactors and pressurized water reactors supplied with MOX fuel, Ann. Nucl. Energy 103, 356–362 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Tirel, T. Kooyman, C. Coquelet-Pascal, E. Merle, Possibility to stabilize plutonium inventory in a sodium-cooled small modular reactors − Pressurized water reactors fleet, Ann. Nucl. Energy 146, 107632 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Aniel, J. Bergeron, A. Puill, Evaluation of the maximum content of a MOX-fueled pressurized water reactor versus isotopic composition with respect to the void coefficient, Article publié lors d'un comité technique, n° XA9744117, Newby Bridge, Royaume Uni, 1995 [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T.E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S.J.v.d. Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K.J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A.R.J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. Carey, I. Polat, Y. Feng, E.W. Moore, J. VanderPlas, D. Laxalde, J. Perktold, R. Cimrman, I. Henriksen, E. Quintero, C.R. Harris, A.M. Archibald, A.H. Ribeiro, F. Pedregosa, P. van Mulbregt, SciPy 1.0 Contributors, SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python, Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. N. Thiollière, J.-B. Clavel, F. Courtin, X. Doligez, M. Ernoult, Z. Issoufou, G. Krivtchik, B. Leniau, B. Mouginot, A. Bidaud, S. David, V. Lebrin, C. Perigois, Y. Richet, A. Somaini, A methodology for performing sensitivity analysis in dynamic fuel cycle simulation studies applied to a PWR fleet simulated with the CLASS tool, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 4, 113 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  24. ANDRA, Inventaire national des matières et déchets radioactifs, Rapport de synthèse, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Gelles, Microstructural examination of commercial ferritic alloys at 200 dpa, J. Nucl. Mater. 1, 293–298 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. W. Zhou, Resilience analysis of nuclear fuel cycle scenarios, PhD thesis, Université de Grenoble, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Liang, M. Ernoult, X. Doligez, S. David, S. Bouneau, N. Thiollière, G. Krivtchik, F. Courtin, W. Zhou, S. Tillement, Assessment of strategy robustness under disruption of objective in dynamic fuel cycle studies, Ann. Nucl. Energy 154, 108131 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.