EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 12 (2026) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 12 (2026) 10 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 12, 2026
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 23
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2026003
Published online 03 April 2026
  1. Ricciardi, G., Faucher, V., Rossi, L., François, F., Collard, B., Bardet, P., Review of spacer grid to rod fretting in pressurized water reactor, Nucl. Eng. Des. 418, 112901 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.112901 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chang, S.-K., Kim, S., Song, C.-H., Turbulent mixing in a rod bundle with vaned spacer grids: OECD/NEA–KAERI CFD benchmark exercise test, Nucl. Eng. Des. 279, 19 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.05.013 [Google Scholar]
  3. Lee, J.R., Kim, J., Song, C.-H., Synthesis of the turbulent mixing in a rod bundle with vaned spacer grids based on the OECD-KAERI CFD benchmark exercise, Nucl. Eng. Des. 279, 3 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  4. Rashkovan, A., McClure, D., Novog, D.R., Examination of separate-effect and integral phenomena within a grid spacer with mixing vanes: Results for the MATiS-H OECD/NEA benchmark exercise, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 177, 141 (2014), https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE13-4 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cinosi, N., Walker, S.P., Bluck, M.J., Issa, R., CFD simulation of turbulent flow in a rod bundle with spacer grids (MATIS-H) using STAR-CCM+, Nucl. Eng. Des. 279, 37 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.06.019 [Google Scholar]
  6. Podila, K., Rao, Y., CFD modelling of turbulent flows through 5 × 5 fuel rod bundles with spacer-grids, Ann. Nucl. Energy 97, 86 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  7. Batta, A., Class, A.G., CFD study of isothermal water flow in rod bundle with split-type spacer grid, in SNA + MC 2013 – Joint International Conference on Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications + Monte Carlo (EDP Sciences, Paris (France), 2014), p. 01201, https://doi.org/10.1051/snamc/201401201 [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang, Y., Cai, J., Research on prediction of turbulence intensities of 5-by-5 rod bundle with a split-vane spacer grid, Prog. Nucl. Energy 152, 104354 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104354 [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, Y., Wang, M., Ju, H., Zhao, M., Zhang, D., Tian, W., Liu, T., Squire, S., Su, G.H., CFD simulation of flow and heat transfer characteristics in a 5×5 fuel rod bundles with spacer grids of advanced PWR, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52, 1386 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.12.012 [Google Scholar]
  10. Mistry, H., Numerical investigations of flow in nuclear fuel assembly with spacer grid and OpenFOAM validation, Kerntechnik 88, 141 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1515/kern-2022-0109 [Google Scholar]
  11. Peña-Monferrer, C., Muñoz-Cobo, J.L., Chiva, S., CFD turbulence study of PWR spacer-grids in a rod bundle, Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 2014, 1 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/635651 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang, D., Tavoularis, S., Hybrid simulations of the near field of a split-vane spacer grid in a rod bundle, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 51, 151 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  13. Končar, B., Košmrlj, S., Simulation of turbulent flow in MATIS-H rod bundle with split-type mixing vanes, Nucl. Eng. Des. 327, 112 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.12.017 [Google Scholar]
  14. Faucher, H., Palancher, H., Ricciardi, G., Puscas, M.-A., Lo Pinto, E., Rossi, L., Recent developments in coupled experiments and simulation to understand the fluid–structure dynamics of a pressurized water reactor fuel assembly, Nucl. Eng. Des. 420, 113054 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113054 [Google Scholar]
  15. Turankok, N., Moreno, F., Bantiche, S., Bazin, F., Biscay, V., Lohez, T., Picard, D., Testaniere, S., Rossi, L., Unsteady pressure and velocity measurements in 5 × 5 rods bundle using grids with and without mixing vanes, Nucl. Eng. Des. 364, 110687 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110687 [Google Scholar]
  16. Turankok, N., Lohez, T., Bazin, F., Biscay, V., Rossi, L., Exploration of frequencies peaks observed on local wall pressure measurements by time-resolved velocity field measurements in complex flows, Exp. Fluids 62, 38 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-03126-y [Google Scholar]
  17. Turankok, N., Lohez, T., Biscay, V., Rossi, L., Velocity and pressure fluctuations downstream analytical spacer grids: Structure and transport, Nucl. Eng. Des. 430, 113682 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113682 [Google Scholar]
  18. Farges, B., Gauffre, M.-C., Benhamadouche, S., Badel, P., Faucher, V., Ricciardi, G., Advanced benchmark of the flow through a mixing vane grid – Large eddy simulation validation, Nucl. Eng. Des. 381, 111335 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111335 [Google Scholar]
  19. Pope, S.B., Turbulent flows (2003) [Google Scholar]
  20. Nguyen, T., Hassan, Y., Stereoscopic particle image velocimetry measurements of flow in a rod bundle with a spacer grid and mixing vanes at a low Reynolds number, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 67, 202 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2017.08.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yu, X., Zhang, Y., Squire, S., Chen, Q., Tan, S., Experimental study on the structure of the velocity boundary layer in a 3 × 3 rod bundle channel, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 137 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  22. Kraus, A., Merzari, E., Norddine, T., Marin, O., Benhamadouche, S., Direct numerical simulation of fluid flow in a 5×5 square rod bundle, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 90, 108833 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2021.108833 [Google Scholar]
  23. Emory, M., Iaccarino, G., Visualizing turbulence anisotropy in the spatial domain with componentality contours, in Annual Research Briefs (Stanford University Center for Turbulence Research) (2014), pp. 123–139 [Google Scholar]
  24. Banerjee, S., Krahl, R., Durst, F., Zenger, C., Presentation of anisotropy properties of turbulence, invariants versus eigenvalue approaches, J. Turbul. 8, 32 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1080/14685240701506896 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kraus, A., Merzari, E., Norddine, T., Marin, O., Benhamadouche, S., Large Eddy simulation of a 5 × 5 rod bundle: Impacts of a central control rod thimble tube, Nucl. Eng. Des. 381, 111337 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111337 [Google Scholar]
  26. Benhamadouche, S., On the use of (U)RANS and LES approaches for turbulent incompressible single phase flows in nuclear engineering applications, Nucl. Eng. Des. 312, 2 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Nicoud, F., Ducros, F., Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor [Google Scholar]
  28. Bieder, U., Falk, F., Fauchet, G., LES analysis of the flow in a simplified PWR assembly with mixing grid, Prog. Nucl. Energy 75, 15 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.03.014 [Google Scholar]
  29. Bieder, U., Falk, F., Fauchet, G., CFD analysis of the flow in the near wake of a generic PWR mixing grid, Ann. Nucl. Energy 82, 169 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  30. Bieder, U., Genrault, C., CFD analysis of intra and inter fuel assembly mixing, Ann. Nucl. Energy 135, 106977 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.106977 [Google Scholar]
  31. Michel, A., Bergeron, A., Puscas, M.A., A comparative analysis of the flow in a rod bundle with two guide-tubes and mixing grids, URANS simulation and Wall-Modeled LES of the ALAIN experiment, Nucl. Eng. Des. 441, 114115 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114115 [Google Scholar]
  32. Turankok, N., Experimental study of the coupled dynamics of forces and pressure and velocity fields in complex and turbulent flows, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris-Saclay, 2022 [Google Scholar]
  33. Bieder, U., Barthel, V., Ducros, F., Quéméré, P., Vandroux, S., CFD calculations of wire wrapped fuel bundles: Modeling and validation strategies, in Workshop Proceedings, CFD4NRS-3, NEA-CSNI-R–2011-14, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, 14–16 September 2010 (2010), https://inis.iaea.org/records/03f1k-0ea10 [Google Scholar]
  34. Fortin, T., Une méthode d’éléments finis à décomposition L2 d’ordre élevé motivée par la simulation des écoulements diphasiques bas Mach, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris VI, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hirt, C.C., Nichols, B.D., Romero, N.C., SOLA – A numerical solution algorithm for transient flow, Technical report LA-5852, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1975 [Google Scholar]
  36. Angeli, P.-E., Puscas, M.-A., Fauchet, G., Cartalade, A., FVCA8 benchmark for the Stokes and Navier–Stokes equations with the TrioCFD code–Benchmark session, in Finite Volumes for Complex Applications VIII – Methods and Theoretical Aspects, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, edited by Cancès, C., Omnes, P. (Springer, Cham, 2017), Vol. 199, pp. 181–202, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57397-7_12 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.