EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 12 (2026) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 12 (2026) 3 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 12, 2026
Article Number 3
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2025076
Published online 12 January 2026
  1. D. Iracane, P. Chaix, A. Alamo, Jules Horowitz Reactor: A high performance material testing reactor, C. R. Phys. 9, 445 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2007.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  2. P.J. Turinsky, G.T. Parks, Advances in nuclear fuel management for light water reactors, in Advances in Nuclear Science and Technology, edited by J. Lewins et al. (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1999), pp. 137–165, https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47088-8_6 [Google Scholar]
  3. J.-P. Haton, E. Haton, M.-Ch. Haton, in Intelligences artificielles: De la théorie à la pratique, Modèles, Applications et enjeux des IA, Dunod, 2023, p. 23 [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Li, J. Wang, M. Ding, A review on optimization methods for nuclear reactor fuel reloading analysis, Nucl. Eng. Des. 397, 111950 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111950, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549322003016 [Google Scholar]
  5. P.W. Poon, G.T. Parks, Application of genetic algorithms to in-core nuclear fuel management optimization, in: Proc. Joint Int. Conf. Mathematical Methods and Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications, Karlsruhe (1993), vol. 1, p. 777 [Google Scholar]
  6. J.L.C. Chapot, F. Carvalho Da Silva, R. Schirru, A new approach to the use of genetic algorithms to solve the pressurized water reactor’s fuel management optimization problem, Ann. Nucl. Energy 26, 641 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4549(98)00078-4, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454998000784 [Google Scholar]
  7. B.Q. Do, L.P. Nguyen, Application of a genetic algorithm to the fuel reload optimization for a research reactor, Appl. Math. Comput. 187, 977 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.09.024, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300306012343 [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  8. A.V. Sobolev, A.S. Gazetdinov, D.S. Samokhin, Genetic algorithms for nuclear reactor fuel load and reload optimization problems, Nucl. Energy Technol. 3, 231 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2017.07.002, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452303817300602 [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Israeli, E. Gilad, Novel genetic algorithm for loading pattern optimization based on core physics heuristics, Ann. Nucl. Energy 118, 35 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.03.042, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454918301609 [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Shaukat et al., Multiobjective core reloading pattern optimization of PARR-1 using modified genetic algorithm coupled with Monte Carlo methods, Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 2021, 1802492 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1802492, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1155/2021/1802492, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1155/2021/1802492 [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Chham et al., Fuel reloads optimization for TRIGA research reactor using genetic algorithm coupled with neutronic and thermal-hydraulic codes, Prog. Nucl. Energy 133, 103637 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103637, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197021000093 [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Gomez-Fernandez et al., Status of research and development of learning-based approaches in nuclear science and engineering: A review, Nucl. Eng. Des. 359, 110479 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110479, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549319305102 [Google Scholar]
  13. H.G. Kim, S.H. Chang, B.H. Lee, Pressurized water reactor core parameter prediction using an artificial neural network, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 113, 70 (1993), https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE93-A23994 [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Tirel et al., Coupling reactor design and scenario calculations: A promising method for scenario optimization, EPJ Nucl. Sci. Technol. 8, 7 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2022002 [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Leniau et al., A neural network approach for burn-up calculation and its application to the dynamic fuel cycle code CLASS, Ann. Nucl. Energy 81, 125 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.03.035, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454915001693 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Yamamoto, Application of neural network for loading pattern screening of in-core optimization calculations, Nucl. Technol. 144, 63 (2003), https://doi.org/10.13182/NT03-A3429 [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Palmi, W. Kubinski, P. Darnowski, Prediction of the evolution of the nuclear reactor core parameters using artificial neural network, Ann. Nucl. Energy 211, 110891 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2024.110891, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924005541 [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Jang, H. Lee, Prediction of pressurized water reactor core design parameters using artificial neural network for loading pattern optimization, in: Proceedings of the Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Virtual Spring Meeting, Korea (2020), pp. 9–10 [Google Scholar]
  19. C.G. Forrest Shriver, J. Watson, Prediction of neutronics parameters within a two-dimensional reflective PWR assembly using deep learning, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 195, 626 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1852021 [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Erdoğan, M. Geçkinli, A PWR reload optimisation code (XCore) using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms, Ann. Nucl. Energy 30, 35 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4549(02)00041-5, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454902000415 [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Wan, K. Lei, Y. Li, Optimization method of fuel-reloading pattern for PWR based on the improved convolutional neural network and genetic algorithm, Ann. Nucl. Energy 171, 109028 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2022.109028, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454922000639 [Google Scholar]
  22. M.K. Butt et al., Integrating the deep learning and multi-objective genetic algorithm to the reloading pattern optimization of HPR1000 reactor core, Nucl. Eng. Des. 428, 113531 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113531, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549324006319 [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Gaillot et al., Jules Horowitz Reactor development of an experimental loop integrating an optimized irradiation process, in: RRFM-IGORR 2016, Berlin, Germany (2016), https://cea.hal.science/cea-02431790 [Google Scholar]
  24. E. Brun et al., TRIPOLI-4®, CEA, EDF and AREVA reference MONTE CARLO code, Ann. Nucl. Energy 82, 151 (2015), Joint International Conference on Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications and Monte Carlo 2013, SNA + MC 2013, Pluri- and Trans-disciplinarity, Towards New Modeling and Numerical Simulation Paradigms, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.07.053, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454914003843 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. J.H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence (MIT Press, 1992) [Google Scholar]
  26. A.F. Gad, Pygad: An intuitive genetic algorithm python library, in Multimedia Tools and Applications (2023), pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  27. Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio et al., Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series, in: The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks (1995), vol. 3361, p. 1995 [Google Scholar]
  28. F. Chollet et al., Keras (2015), https://github.com/fchollet/keras [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Abadi et al., TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems, Software available from tensorflow.org (2015), https://www.tensorflow.org/ [Google Scholar]
  30. A. de Myttenaere et al., Mean absolute percentage error for regression models, Neurocomputing 192, 38 (2016), Advances in artificial neural networks, machine learning and computational intelligence, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.114, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231216003325 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.