EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 11 (2025) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 11 (2025) 44 References
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 11, 2025
Euratom Research and Training in 2025: ‘Challenges, achievements and future perspectives’, edited by Roger Garbil, Seif Ben Hadj Hassine, Patrick Blaise, and Christophe Girold
Article Number 44
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2025044
Published online 19 August 2025
  1. ASN, Qualification des outils de calcul scientifique utilisés dans la démonstration de sûreté nucléaire – re barrière, Guide N°28, 07 2017 [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Gandini, On transposition of experimental reactor data to reference design, Technical report, Comitato nazionale per la ricerca e per lo sviluppo dell’energia nucleare e delle energie alternative, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Gandini, Extended bias-factor data transposition method, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 50, 11 (1985) [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Fort, G. Rimpault, J.-C. Bosq, B. Camous, V. Zammit, E. Dupont, R. Jacqmin, P. Smith, D. Biron, D. Verrier, Improved performances of the fast reactor calculational system eranos-eralib1 due to improved a priori nuclear data and consideration of additional specific integral data, Ann. Nucl. Energy 30, 1879 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Palmiotti, M. Salvatores, G. Aliberti, H. Hiruta, R. McKnight, P. Oblozinsky, W.S. Yang, A global approach to the physics validation of simulation codes for future nuclear systems, Ann. Nucl. Energy 36, 355 (2009), PHYSOR 2008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J.-C. Bosq, Développement et qualification d’un formulaire adapté à SUPERPHENIX avec réflecteurs. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Provence (AIX-MARSEILLE I),1998 [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Blaise, S. Cathalau, P. Fougeras, An application of sensitivity and representativity approach for the design of a 100% MOX BWR experimental program in ZPR, Ann. Nucl. Energy 163, 108566 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Dos Santos, P. Blaise, A. Santamarina, A global approach of the representativity concept: Application on a high-conversion light water reactor mox lattice case, in International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science & Engineering (M& C 2013) Sun Valley, Idaho, USA, 5 2013, (American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, IL) [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Calloo, COCAGNE: EDF new neutronic core code for ANDROMeDE calculation chain, in Proceedings of the M&C 2017, Jeju, Korea, April 2017 [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Ivanov, M. Avramova, Benchmarks for Uncertainty Analysis in Modelling (UAM) for the Design, Operation and Safety Analysis of LWRs – Volume I: Specification and Support Data for Neutronics Cases (Phase I) (OECD Publishing, Paris, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Clouvel, Uncertainty quantification of the fast flux calculation for a PWR vessel, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris Saclay (COmUE), 2019 [Google Scholar]
  12. M.L. Williams, Perturbation theory for reactor analysis, crc handbook of nuclear reactor calculations (CRC Press Rogen, 1986) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Gandini, G. Palmiotti, M. Salvatores, A generalized perturbation method for bi-linear functionals of the real and adjoint neutron fluxes, J. Nucl. Energy 21, 755 (1967) [Google Scholar]
  14. D.G. Cacuci, Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis (Chapman Hall/CRC, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Gelman, J.-B. Carlin, H.S. Stern, D.B. Dunson, A. Vehtari, D.B. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis (Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  16. V.V. Orlov, A.A. Van’Kov, A.I. Voropaev, Yu.A. Kazanskij, V.I. Matveev, V.M. Murogov, E.A. Khodarev, Problems of fast reactor physics related to breeding, At. Energy. Rev. 18, 989 (1980) [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Frosio, T. Bonaccorsi, P. Blaise, Extension of Bayesian inference for multi-experimental and coupled problem in neutronics – a revisit of the theoretical approach, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 4, 19 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Fougeras, J.-P. Hudelot, D. Rippert, F. Mellier, P. Blaise, M. Antony, N. Huot, The place of EOLE, MINERVE and MASURCA facilities in the R&D and training Activities of the CEA, in PHYTRA1: First International Conference on Physics and Technology of Reactors and Applications, Mar 2007 [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Mondot, EPICURE: An experimental program devoted to the validation of the calculational schemes for plutonium recycling in PWRs, in Proceedings of the PHYSOR90 Conference (Marseille, France, 1990), Vol. 121, pp. 32–40 [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Blaise, O. Litaize, J.-F. Vidal, A. Santamarina, Qualification of the French APOLLO2.8/CEA2005V4 code package on absorber clusters in 17 × 17 PWR type lattices through the CAMELEON program, in Proceedings of the PHYSOR2010 Conference (Pittsburgh, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  21. C. De Saint Jean, P. Archier, G. Noguere, O. Litaize, C. Vaglio-Gaudard, D. Bernard, O. Leray, Estimation of multi-group cross section covariances of 235, 238U, 239Pu, 241Am, 56Fe, 23Na and 27Al, in Proceedings of the PHYSOR2012 Conference (American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, IL, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA, 04 2012) [Google Scholar]
  22. E. Njayou, Application de la méthode de transposition aux mesures du parc nucléaire d’EDF, Ph.D. thesis, Université de Grenoble, Nov. 2024 [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Sanchez, I. Zmijarevic, M. Coste-Delclaux, E. Masiello, S. Santandrea, E. Martinolli, L. Villatte, N. Schwartz, N. Guler, Apollo2 year 2010, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 42, 474 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. E. Njayou, D. Couyras, P. Blaise, J.-P. Argaud, N. Dos Santos, Application of the Transposition Method Involving Industrial Nuclear Plants Measurements: Case of the Critical Boron Concentration, in Proceedings of the M&C 2023 (American Nuclear Society, Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada, Aug. 2023) [Google Scholar]
  25. P.J. Collins, Advances in Nuclear Science and Technology, chapter Experiment Information for Fast Reactors (Springer US, Boston, MA, USA, 1982), p. 159 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.