EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2023) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 9 (2023) 34 References
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 9, 2023
Templates of Expected Measurement Uncertainties: a CSEWG Effort
Article Number 34
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2023018
Published online 10 November 2023
  1. N. Otuka et al., Towards a more complete and accurate experimental nuclear reaction data library (EXFOR): International collaboration between nuclear reaction data centres (NRDC), Nucl. Data Sheets 120, 272 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Neudecker et al., Templates of expected measurement uncertainties, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 9, 35 (2023) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. A.M. Lewis, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. R.E. Slovacek et al., 238U(n, f) measurements below 100 keV, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 62, 455 (1977) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Mondelaers et al., GELINA, a neutron time-of-flight facility for high-resolution neutron data measurements, Res. Infrastruct. 11, 19 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Guber et al., New neutron cross-section measurements at ORELA and their application in nuclear criticality calculations, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 241, 218 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Beer et al., 178,179,180Hf and 180Ta(n,γ) cross sections and their contribution to stellar nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. C 26, 1404 (1982) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. P.W. Lisowski et al., Los Alamos National Laboratory spallation neutron sources, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 106, 208 (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J.E. Lynn, Helios: The new Harwell electron linear accelerator, and its scientific programme, Contemp. Phys. 21, 483 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Sun et al., Validation of a fuel management code MCODE-FM against fission product poisoning and flux wire measurements of the MIT reactor, Prog. Nucl. Energy 75, 42 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A.D. Carlson et al., Fluctuations in neutron total cross sections, Phys. Rev. 158, 1142 (1967) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Policroniades et al., An associated particle time-of-flight facility for neutron cross section measurement, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 346, 230 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. E.M. Hafner et al., The total n-p scattering cross section at 4.75 Mev, Phys. Rev. 89, 204 (1953) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Bratenahl et al., Neutron total cross sections in the 7- to 14-Mev region, Phys. Rev. 110, 927 (1958) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. D.B. Fossan et al., Neutron total cross sections of Be, B10, B, C, and O, Phys. Rev. 123, 209 (1961) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. G.D. Kim et al., Production of monoenergetic MeV-range neutrons by 3H(p, n)3He reaction, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 271, 541 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Danon et al., Minimizing the statistical error of resonance parameters and cross-sections derived from transmission measurements, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 485, 585 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Schillebeeckx, Transmission TOF measurement uncertainty components and reporting of data, in Mini-CSEWG on Templates of Measurement Uncertainties, CSEWG, Los Alamos, NM, April 30 – May 1 2019 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  19. D.B. Syme et al., Background and resolution functions in neutron time-of-flight spectrometers, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Antwerp, Belgium, September 6–10 1982 (1983), p. 886 [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Schillebeeckx et al., Determination of Resonance parameters and their covariances from neutron induced reaction cross section data, Nucl. Data Sheets 113, 3054 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J.M. Brown et al., Validation of unresolved neutron resonance parameters using a thick-sample transmission measurement, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 194, 221 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Stamatopoulos et al., New capability for neutron transmission measurements at LANSCE: The DICER instrument, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1025, 166166 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A.M. Lane et al., R-matrix theory of nuclear reactions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 30, 257 (1958) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  24. F.H. Froehner, Evaluation and Analysis of Nuclear Resonance Data, Tech. Rep., JEFF Report 18 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  25. C.J. Werner et al., MCNP Users Manual – Code Version 6.2, Tech. Rep., LA-UR-17-29981 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  26. R.E. MacFarlane et al., Methods for processing ENDF/B-VII with NJOY, Nucl. Data Sheets 111, 2739 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. F.H. Froehner, SESH: A Fortran IV Code for Calculating the Self-shielding and Multiple Scattering Effects for Neutron Cross Section Data Interpretation in the Unresolved Resonance Region, Tech. Rep., GA-8380 (1968) [Google Scholar]
  28. V. Sobes et al., NE 697: Nuclear Data, Spring 2018, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 2018, University Lecture, https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLA-IQaSyWKTD9mMu89i3a55RrWD-8hDGQ [Google Scholar]
  29. N.M. Larson, Updated Users Guide for SAMMY: Multilevel R-Matrix Fits to Neutron Data Using Bayes’ Equations, Tech. Rep., ORNL/TM-9179/R8 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  30. M.C. Moxon et al., GEEL REFIT, A Least Squares Fitting Program for Resonance Analysis of Neutron Transmission and Capture Data Computer Code, Tech. Rep., AEA-InTec-0630 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  31. G.M. Hale, Use of R-matrix methods for light element evaluations, in Proceedings of the Conference on Nuclear Data Evaluation Methods and Procedures (Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, March 1981), p. 509. [Google Scholar]
  32. E.P. Wigner, Random matrices in physics, SIAM Rev. 9, 1 (1967) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. C.E. Porter et al., Fluctuations of nuclear reaction widths, Phys. Rev. 104, 483 (1956) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. F. Gunsing et al., EXFOR Data in Resonance Region and Spectrometer Response Function, Tech. Rep., INDC(NDS)-0647 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  35. B. Becker et al., Analysis of Geel Spectra – AGS, Tech. Rep., NEA/DB/DOC(2014)4 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  36. B. Becker et al., Data reduction and uncertainty propagation of time-of-flight spectra with AGS, J. Inst. 7, P11002 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  37. N. Otsuka, Reaction yield divided by areal density, in NRDC 2017 (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  38. N. Otuka, O. Cabellos, Summary Report of the Technical Meeting on the International Network of Nuclear Reaction Data Centres, INDC(NDS)-0736 (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  39. C. Coceva et al., Calculation of the ORELA neutron moderator spectrum and resolution function, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 211, 459 (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. D. Ene et al., Global characterisation of the GELINA facility for high-resolution neutron time-of-flight measurements by Monte Carlo simulations, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 618, 54 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. P.E. Koehler, Improved 95Mo neutron resonance parameters and astrophysical reaction rates, Phys. Rev. C 105, 054306 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. D. Neudecker et al., Template for estimating uncertainties of measured neutron-induced fission cross-sections, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 4, 21 (2018) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  43. M.J. Trbovich et al., Hafnium resonance parameter analysis using neutron capture and transmission experiments, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 161, 303 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. A.M. Lewis et al., Templates of expected measurement uncertainties for capture and charged-particle production cross section observables, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 9, 33 (2023) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  45. J.R. Vanhoy et al., Templates of expected measurement uncertainties for (n, xn) cross sections, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 9, 31 (2023) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.