Open Access
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 8, 2022
Article Number 35
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 02 December 2022
  1. F. Varaine, et al., Astrid project, from conceptual to basic design: progress status, in Proceeding of FR17, IAEA-CN245-413 (Yekaterinburg, Russia, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Varaine, et al., The collaboration of Japan and France on the design of ASTRID sodium fast reactor, in Proceeding of ICAPP2017 (Fukui and Kyoto, Japan, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Varaine, et al., ASTRID project, general overview and status progress, Proceeding of ICAPP2018 (Charlotte, NC, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Hourcade, et al., ASTRID Nuclear Island design: advances in French-Japanese joint team development of Decay Heat Removal systems, in Proceeding of ICAPP2016 (San Francisco, CA, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Matsunaga, et al., Holding force tests of Curie Point Electro-Magnet in hot gas for passive shutdown system, in Proceedings of ICONE-27 (Tsukuba, Japan, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Yamamoto, et al., Comparison of sodium fast reactor core assembly seismic evaluation using the Japanese JAEA/MFBR/MHI and French CEA simulation tools, in Proceeding of ICAPP2019 (Juan-les-pins, France, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Takano, et al., Routing study of above core structure with mock-up experiment for ASTRID, in Proceeding of ICAPP2019 (Juan-les-pins, France, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Serre, et al., France-Japan collaboration on the severe accident studies for ASTRID: outcomes and future work program, in Proceeding of ICAPP2017 (Fukui and Kyoto, Japan, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Maeda, et al., Current status of the next generation fast reactor core & fuel design and related R&Ds in Japan, in Proceeding of FR17, IAEA-CN245-269 (Yekaterinburg, Russia, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Okubo, et al., Conceptual design for a large-scale Japan sodium-cooled fast reactor (3) core design in JSFR, in Proceeding of ICAPP2011 (Nice, France, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Nakanishi, et al., Development of passive shutdown system for SFR, Nucl. Technol. 170, 181 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Yamano, et al., Safety design and evaluation in a large-scale Japan sodium-cooled fast reactor, Sci. Technol. Nucl. Installations, 2012, 614973 (2012), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Venard, et al., The ASTRID core at the end of the conceptual design phase, in Proceeding of FR17, IAEA-CN245-288 (Yekaterinburg, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. B. Fontaine, et al., ASTRID: an innovative control rod system to manage reactivity, in Proceeding of ICAPP2016 (San Francisco, CA, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Beck, et al., Pre-conceptual design of ASTRID fuel subassemblies, in Proceeding of ICAPP2016 (San Francisco, CA, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Geffraye, et al., CATHARE 2 V2.5 2: a single version for various applications, Nucl. Eng. Design 241, 4456 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Lavastre, et al., State of the art of CATHARE model for transient safety analysis of ASTRID SFR, in Proceedings of NUTHOS-10 (Okinawa, Japan, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Bertrand, et al., Status of severe accident studies at the end of the conceptual design of ASTRID: feedback on mitigation features, Nucl. Eng. Design 326, 55 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Lo Pinto, et al., Preliminary safety orientations for ASTRID, Proceeding of ICAPP2013 (Jeju island, Korea, 2013) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.