EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 7 (2021) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 7 (2021) 18 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 7, 2021
Article Number 18
Number of page(s) 24
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2021017
Published online 28 October 2021
  1. European Joint Programme on Radioactive Waste Management, EU H2020-Euratom-1.2 program, Grant agreement ID: 847593, https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/847593 [Google Scholar]
  2. Coordinated Research Project (CRP) on Spent Fuel Characterization (T13018). https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/new-crp-spent-fuel-characterization-t13018 [Google Scholar]
  3. ARIANE International Programme Final Report, Belgonucléaire, AR2000/15 BN Ref. 0000253/221, Revision B, December 2000 [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Michel-Sendis et al., SFCOMPO-2.0: An OECD NEA database of spent nuclear fuel isotopic assays, reactor design specifications, and operating data, Ann. Nucl. Energy 110, 779 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, M. Hursin, Analysis for the ARIANE GU1 sample: nuclide inventory and decay heat, Ann. Nucl. Energy 160, 108359 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, M. Hursin, R. Ichou, J. Taforeau, T. Simeonov, Analysis for the ARIANE GU3 sample: nuclide inventory and decay heat, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 7, 14 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Rhodes, K. Smith, D. Lee, CASMO-5 development and applications, in Proceedings of the PHYSOR-2006 conference, ANS Topical Meeting on Reactor Physics, Vancouver, BC, Canada, September 10–14, Vancouver, BC, Canada, September 10–14, 2006 (2006), p. B144 [Google Scholar]
  8. A.S. DiGiovine, J.D. Rhodes III, K.S. Smith, D.M. Ver Planck, J.A. Umbarger, SIMULATE−3 Users Manual, Studsvik/SOA-95/15, Studsvik (1995) [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Simeonov, C. Wemple, Update and evaluation of decay data for spent nuclear fuel analyses, Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, ND2016, Bruges, Belgium, September 11–16, 2016, EPJ Web Conf. 146, 09011 (2017) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, M. Seidl, J. Basualdo, Improvement of PIE analysis with a full core simulation: The U1 case, Ann. Nucl. Energy 148, 107706 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. O. Leray, H. Ferroukhi, M. Hursin, A. Vasiliev, D. Rochman, Methodology for core analyses with nuclear data uncertainty quantification and application to Swiss PWR operated cycles, Ann. Nucl. Energy 110, 547 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Ferroukhi, K. Hofer, J.M. Hollard, A. Vasiliev, M.A. Zimmermann, Core modelling and analysis of the Swiss Nuclear Power Plants for qualified R&D applications, in the Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on the Physics of Reactors, PHYSOR’08, Interlaken, Switzerland (2008) [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Rochman, A. Dokhane, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, M. Hursin, Nuclear data uncertainties for core parameters based on Swiss BWR operated cycles, Ann. Nucl. Energy 148, 107727 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, A. Dokhane, H. Ferroukhi, Uncertainties for Swiss LWR spent nuclear fuels due to nuclear data, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 4, 6 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, M. Pecchia, Consistent criticality and radiation studies of Swiss spent nuclear fuel: the CS2M approach, J. Hazard. Mater. 357, 384 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, M. Pecchia, Optimization of Swiss used nuclear fuel canister for final repository: homogeneous vs. mixed loading, Ann. Nucl. Energy 148, 107756 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Rochman, A. Dokhane, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, M. Hursin, Nuclear data uncertainties for Swiss BWR spent nuclear fuel characteristics, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 233 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Macian, M.A. Zimmermann, R. Chawla, Assessment of CASMO-4 predictions of the isotopic inventory of high burn-up MOX fuel, in Proceedings of PHYSOR 2004 Conference, Chicago, USA, April 24–29 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  19. D.A. Brown et al., ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data, Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 1 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A.J.M. Plompen et al., The joint evaluated fission and fusion nuclear data library, JEFF-3.3, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 181 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Shibata et al., JENDL-4.0: a new library for nuclear science and engineering, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48, 1 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Hursin, S. Pelloni, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, Treatment of the implicit effect in Shark-X, Ann. Nucl. Eng. 138, 107178 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. O. Leray, D. Rochman, P. Grimm, H. Ferroukhi, A. Vasiliev, M. Hursin, G. Perret, A. Pautz, Nuclear data uncertainty propagation on spent fuel nuclide compositions, Ann. Nucl. Energy 94, 603 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. O. Leray, P. Grimm, M. Hursin, Ferroukhi, A. Pautz, Uncertainty quantification of spent fuel nuclide compositions due to cross-sections, decay constants and fission yields, in PHYSOR 2014 – The Role of Reactor Physics Toward a Sustainable Future, The Westin Miyako, Kyoto, Japan, September 28 - October 3, 2014, on CD-ROM (2014) [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Rochman, O. Leray, M. Hursin, H. Ferroukhi, A. Vasiliev, A. Aures, F. Bostelmann, W. Zwermann, O. Cabellos, C.J. Diez, J. Dyrda, N. Garcia-Herranz, E. Castro, S. van der Marck, H. Sjöstrand, A. Hernandez, M. Fleming, J.-Ch. Sublet, L. Fiorito, Nuclear data uncertainties for typical LWR fuel assemblies and a simple reactor core, Nucl. Data Sheets 139, 1 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Rochman, Quantification of Uncertainties and Biases in CASM0-5 calculations of 244Cm nuclide compositions for the Ul, U2, U7, BMl and BM5 samples, PSI report, TM-41-16-10, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  27. E. Georgieva, J. Hykes, R. Ferrer, J. Rhodes, CASMO5 isotopic comparison to the ARIANE mixed-oxyde pressurized water reactor spent fuel measurements, in PHYSOR 2018: Reactor Physics paving the way towards more efficient systems Cancun, Mexico, April 22–26, 2018 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  28. S.D. Phillips, K.R. Eberhardt, B. Parry, Guidelines for expressing the uncertainty of measurement results containing uncorrected bias, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 102, 577 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.