EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 4, 2018
Special Issue on 4th International Workshop on Nuclear Data Covariances, October 2–6, 2017, Aix en Provence, France – CW2017
Article Number 41
Number of page(s) 9
Section Applied Covariances
Published online 14 November 2018
  1. E. Brun, TRIPOLI-4, CEA, EDF and AREVA reference Monte Carlo code, in Joint International Conference on Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications and Monte Carlo (2015), Vol. 82, pp. 151–160 [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Fukushima, Y. Kitamura, T. Kugo, S. Okajima, Benchmark models for criticalities of FCA-IX assemblies with systematically changed neutron spectra, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 53, 406 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. De Saint Jean et al., Uncertainty evaluation of nuclear reaction model parameters using integral and microscopic measurements with the CONRAD code, in ND2010 Conference (2010) [Google Scholar]
  4. T. Bayes, An essay toward solving a problem in the Doctrine of chances, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 53, 370 (1763) [Google Scholar]
  5. C.E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379 (1948) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Azevedo-Filho, R.D. Shachter, Laplace's method approximations for probabilistic inference in belief networks with continuous variables, in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence Proceedings of the Tenth Conference, Seattle, Washington, USA (1994) pp. 28–36 [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Privas, P. Archier, C. De Saint Jean, G. Noguère, J. Tommasi, The use of nuclear data as nuisance parameters in the integral data assimilation of the PROFIL experiments, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 182, 377 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Tommasi, G. Noguere, Analysis of the PROFIL and PROFIL-2 sample irradiation experiments in Phénix for JEFF-3.1 nuclear data validation, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 160, 232 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Rimpault, D. Plisson, J. Tommasi, R. Jacqmin, The ERANOS code and data system for fast reactor neutronic analyses, in PHYSOR'02, Seoul, KOREA (2002) [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Archier, C. De Saint Jean, G. Noguere, O. Litaize, P. Leconte, C. Bouret, COMAC: nuclear data covariance matrices library for reactor applications, in PHYSOR 2014–The Role of Reactor Physics Toward a Sustainable Future, Kyoto, Japan (2014) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Herman et al., COMMARA-2.0 Neutron Cross Section Covariance Library, BNL-94830-2011, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  12. A.D. Carlson et al., International evaluation of neutron cross section standards, Nucl. Data Sheets 110, 3215 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Otuka, E. Dupont, Towards a more complete and accurate Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data Library (EXFOR): International Collaboration Between Nuclear Reaction Data Centres (NRDC), Nucl. Data Sheets 120, 272 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Danon et al., Simultaneous measurement of 235U fission and capture cross sections from 0.01 eV to 3 keV using a gamma multiplicity detector, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 187, 291 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. O. Iwamoto, R. McKnight, International Evaluation Co-operation Volume 29: Uranium-235 Capture Cross-section in the keV to MeV Energy Region, NEA, NEA/WPEC-29, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Jandel et al., New precision measurements of the 235U(n,g) cross section, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 202506 (2012) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. JEFF-3.3 Nuclear Data library can be downloaded on the NEA website: [Google Scholar]
  18. M.B. Chadwick et al., The CIELO collaboration: neutron reactions on 1H, 16O, 56Fe, 235,238U, and 239Pu, Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 1 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Santamarina, Improvement of 238U inelastic scattering cross section for an accurate calculation of large commercial reactors, Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 118 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.