Open Access
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 2, 2016
Article Number 28
Number of page(s) 15
Published online 10 June 2016
  1. J.J. Duderstadt, L.J. Hamilton, Nuclear Reactor Analysis (Wiley and Sons, New York, 1976) [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Zagar, M. Ravnik, Kerntechnik 70 , 223 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R.M. Gomes do Prado Souza, A.Z. Mesquita, Prog. Nucl. Energy 53 , 1126 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. T. Bily, L. Sklenka, Ann. Nucl. Eng. 71 , 91 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Tsujiet al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 43 , 576 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Santamarina, Thermal effects analysis in LWR lattices - Thermal cross-section shapes and qualification through French integral experiments, IAEA TECDOC-491 (see also CEA Rapport CEA-R-6215, 2009) 1989 [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Cathalauet al., MISTRAL: an experimental program in the EOLE facility devoted to 100% MOX core physics, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Physics of Reactors, PHYSOR 1996, Mito, Japan 1996 [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Yamamotoet al., Core Physics experiment of 100% MOX core MISTRAL, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Future Nuclear Systems, Yokohama, Japan, GLOBAL’97 1997 [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Cathalauet al., First validation of neutronic lattice parameters of over moderated 100% MOX fueled PWR cores on the basis of the MISTRAL experiment, in Proc. Int. Conf. on the Physics of Nuclear Science and Technology: future Nuclear Systems, Long Island, USA 1998 [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Fougeraset al., MISTRAL-4: an experimental mockup in the EOLE facility devoted to high moderation 100% MOX core Physics, in Proc. Int. Conf on the Future Nuclear Systems, GLOBAL’99, Jackson Hole, USA 1999 [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Hibiet al., Analysis of MISTRAL and EPICURE experiments with SRAC and MVP code systems, in Proc. Int. Conf. Physics of Reactor Operation, Design and Computation, PHYSOR2000, Pittsburg, USA 2000 [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Tatsumiet al., Analysis of High Moderation PWR MOX Core MISTRAL-4 with SRAC and MVP, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, ND2001, Tsukuba, Japan 2001 [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Yamamotoet al., Analysis of MISTRAL Experiments with JENDL-3. 2, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, ND2001, Tsukuba, Japan 2001 [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Cathalauet al., Full MOX recycling in ALWR: Lessons Drawn through the MISTRAL Program, in Proc. Int. Conf. PHYSOR2002, Seoul, Korea 2002 [Google Scholar]
  15. O. Litaizeet al., Analysis of the MISTRAL experiment with APOLLO2 qualification of neutronic parameters of UOX and MOX cores, in Proc. Int. Conf. PHYSOR2002, Seoul, Korea 2002 [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Erradiet al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 144 , 47 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Erradi, A. Santamarina, Analysis of the MISTRAL experiment on the reactivity temperature coefficient for UOX and MOX lattices using JEFF-3. 1. 1 nuclear data library, in Proc. Int. Conf. PHYSOR 2010, Advances in Reactor Physics to Power the Nuclear Renaissance, Pittsburgh, USA 2010 [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Sanchezet al., Nucl. Sci. Technol 42 , 474 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  19. B.K. Jeonet al., Nucl. Techol 191 , 1 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Brunet al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 82 , 151 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Santamarinaet al., The JEFF-3. 1. 1 Nuclear Data Library, JEFF Report 22 2009 [Google Scholar]
  22. M.B. Chadwicket al., Nucl. Data Sheets 112 , 2887 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. J.I. Marquez Damianet al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 65 , 280 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R.E. MacFarlane, New thermal neutron scattering files for ENDF/B-VI, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report 1994 [Google Scholar]
  25. R.E. MacFarlane, A.C. Kahler, Nucl. Data Sheets 111 , 2739 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  26. D.E. Cullenet al., How accurately we can calculate neutrons slowing down in water ?, Laurence Livermore National Laboratory Report, UCRL-TR-220605 2006 [Google Scholar]
  27. G. Vineyard, Phys. Rev. 110 , 999 (1958) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Mattes, J. Keinert, Thermal neutron scattering data for the moderator materials in ENDF-6 format and as ACE library for MCNP codes, International Atomic Energy Agency Report INDC(NDS)-0470 2005 [Google Scholar]
  29. D.I. Page, B.C. Haywood, The Harwell scattering law program: frequency distributions of moderators, Harwell Laboratory Report AERE-R-5778 1968 [Google Scholar]
  30. P. Egelstaff, P. Schofield, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 12 , 260 (1962) [Google Scholar]
  31. G. Noguere, J-C. Sublet, Ann. Nucl. Energy 35 , 2259 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Santamarinaet al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 48 , 51 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. C. Lampoudiset al., Eur. Phys. J. Plus 128 , 86 (2013) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  34. G. Noguereet al., Phys. Rev. C 92 , 014607 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. G. Noguere et al. accepted for publication in Nucl. Sci. Eng. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  36. P. Archieret al., Nucl. Data Sheets 118 , 488 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. D. Bernardet al., Pu nuclear data improvements in thermal and epithermal neutron ranges, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology Nice, France 2007 [Google Scholar]
  38. C. De Saint Jeanet al., Co-ordinated Evaluation of Plutonium-239 in the Resonance, Region, Nuclear Energy Agency Report WPEC/DOC(2014)447 2014 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.