Open Access
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 1, 2015
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 13
Published online 09 December 2015
  1. G. Haratyk, C. Lecomte, F.X. Briffod, Flexblue®: a subsea and transportable small modular power plant, in Proceedings of the ICAPP 2014, Charlotte, USA (2014) [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Haratyk, V. Gourmel, Preliminary accident analyses of Flexblue® underwater reactor, in Proceedings of the ICAPP 2015, Nice, France (2015) Paper 15149 [Google Scholar]
  3. European utility requirements for LWR Nuclear Power Plants, Revision D (Oct. 2012) Vol. 2, Chap. 8: Functional Requirements: Systems & Processes, § [Google Scholar]
  4. EPRI, Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility requirements document (1999), Vol. III. [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Thomet, Feasibility studies of a soluble boron-free 900-MW (electric) PWR. Core physics I: motivations, assembly design, and core control, Nucl. Technol. 127, 259 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Patent FR1302763, DCNS, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  7. Patent FR1302764, DCNS, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  8. Patent FR1302765, DCNS, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  9. Patent FR1302766, DCNS, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  10. S.Y. Kim, J.K. Kim, Conceptual core design of 1300-MWe reactor for soluble boron free operation using a new fuel concept, J. Korean Nucl. Soc. 31, 391 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Reuss, Exercices de Neutronique (EDP Sciences, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  12. J.P. Defain, P. Alexandre, P. Thomet, Feasibility studies of a soluble boron-free 900-MW (electric) PWR. Core physics II: control rod follow, load follow and reactivity-initiated accident linked to RCCAs, Nucl. Technol. 127, 267 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  13. G.L. Fiorini, G.M. Gautier, Feasibility studies of a soluble boron-free 900-MW (electric) PWR. Safety systems: consequences of the partial or total elimination of soluble boron on plant safety and plant systems architecture, Nucl. Technol. 127, 239 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  14. NRC 10CFR50 Appendix A to Part 50 “Domestic licensing of production and utilization facilities – General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants”, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  15. Development of IRSN-GRS Safety Approach in view of the EPR detailed Design (IRSN/GRS, 2003), Vol. 5 [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Tarride, Physique, fonctionnement et sûreté des REP (Collection génie atomique, EDP Sciences, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  17. Patent FR2432197A1, CEA, 1978 [Google Scholar]
  18. Patent FR2075928A7, Combustion Engineering, 1971 [Google Scholar]
  19. Patent FR2728098, CEA, 1994 [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Finnemann, H. Bauer, A. Galati, R. Martinelli, Results of LWR core transient benchmarks, NEA/NS/DO(93)25, 1993 [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Fraikin, PWR benchmark on uncontrolled rods withdrawal at zero power, Final report, NEA/NSC/DOC(96)20, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Reuss, Précis de neutronique (EDP Sciences, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  23. A.I. Soldatov, Design and analysis of a nuclear reactor core for innovative small light water reactors, Ph.D. Thesis, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  24. Patent Application filled before the INPI (Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle), FR1402827, by DCNS, December 2014 [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Marleau, R. Roy, A. Hébert, DRAGON: a collision probability transport code for cell and supercell calculations, Report IGE-157, Institut de génie nucléaire, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, 1994 [Google Scholar]
  26. G. Marleau, A. Hébert, R. Roy, A user guide for DRAGON, Report IGE-294, Institut de génie nucléaire, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  27. D. Calic, A. Trkov, M. Kromar, Use of Lattice code DRAGON in reactor calculations, in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference Nuclear Energy for New Europe, September, 2013 (2013) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.