EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 12 (2026) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 12 (2026) 7 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 12, 2026
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2025080
Published online 11 February 2026
  1. A. Mushtak, Specifications and qualification of uranium/aluminium alloy plate target for the production of fission Molybdenum-99, Nucl. Eng. Des. 241, 163 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  2. K.L. Ali, A.A. Khan, A. Mushtak, F. Imtiaz, M.A. Ziai, A. Gulzar, M. Farooq, N. Hussain, N. Ahmed, S. Pervez, J.H. Zaidi, Development of low enriched uranium target plates by thermo-mechanical processing of UAl2-Al matrix for production of 99Mo in Pakistan, Nucl. Eng. Des. 255, 77 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  3. M.A. Durazzo, G.L.C.R. Contorbia, E.F. Urano de Carvalho, Increasing productivity in the manufacture of UAl2-Al dispersion-plate targets for Mo-99 production, Progr. Nucl. Energy 140, 103920 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103920 [Google Scholar]
  4. G.L.C.R. Contorbia, M. Durazzo, E.F. Urano de Carvalho, H.G. Riella, Phase quantification in UAlx-Al dispersion targets for Mo-99 production, J. Nucl. Mater. 509, 465 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.07.029 [Google Scholar]
  5. T.A.G. Restivo, G.L.C.R. Contorbia, E.F. Urano de Carvalho, M. Durazzo, Investigating solid-state reactions in UAl2-Al dispersions fo Mo-99 target fabrication, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 220, 111763 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111763 [Google Scholar]
  6. H.J. Cols, P.R. Cristini, A.C. Manzini, Mo-99 from low-enriched uranium, in RERTR International Meeting, Las Vegas, USA, Oct. 1–6, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Kohut, M. de la Fuente, P. Echenique, D. Podesta, P. Adelfang, Targets development of low enrichment for production of Mo99 for fission, in RERTR International Meeting, Las Vegas, USA, Oct. 1–6, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  8. L.S. DeLuca, H.T. Sumsion, Rate of Growth of Diffusion Layers in U-Al and U-AlSi Couples, 1957, Report KAPL-1747 [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Boucher, Etude des alliages aluminium-uranium. Application à la transformation à l’état solide UAl3 → UAl4, J. Nucl. Mater. 1, 13 (1959), https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(59)90007-8 [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Moussa, O. Tougait, B. Stepnik, Insights on the kinetics and mechanism behaviors of layer formation in UAl2-Al diffusion couple, in RRFM Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 30 March–3 April, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  11. Non-HEU production technologies for Molybdenum-99 and Technetium-99m, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series n° NF-T-5.4, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  12. S.K. Lee, G.L. Beyer, J.S. Lee, Development of industrial-scale fission 99Mo production process using low enriched uranium target, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 48, 613 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.04.006 [Google Scholar]
  13. H.J. Ryu, C.K. Kim, M. Sim, J.M. Park, J.H. Lee, Development of high-density U/Al dispersion plates for Mo-99 production using atomized uranium powder, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 45, 979 (2013), https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.07.2013.014 [Google Scholar]
  14. H.J. Ryu, Y.J. Jeong, J.M. Nam, J.M. Park, Metallurgical considerations for the fabrication of low-enriched uranium dispersion targets with a high density for 99Mo production, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 305, 31 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3838-y [Google Scholar]
  15. T.W. Cho, K.N. Kim, S. Park, Y.J. Jeong, K.H. Lee, S.H. Kim, J.M. Park, Preliminary study of high-density LEU dispersion targets using an atomized uranium-aluminium powder, in Trans. Korean Nucl. Soc. Spring Meeting, Jeju, Korea, May 17–18, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Havette, X. Iltis, H. Palancher, O. Fiquet, M. Pasturel, Short communication: Spark plasma sintering as an innovative process for nuclear fuel plate manufacturing, J. Nucl. Mater. 543, 152541 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152541 [Google Scholar]
  17. X. Iltis, V. Klosek, A. Sanchez, N. Tarisien, S. Valance, S. Lamy, M. Pasturel, Reactive spark plasma sintering of UAl2 + Al powder mixtures, in Proceedings of the RRFM Conference, Aix-en-Provence, France, April 6–10, 2025 [Google Scholar]
  18. C.K. Kim, J.M. Park, H.J. Ryu, Use of a centrifugal atomization process in the development of research reactor fuel, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 39, 617 (2007), https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.2007.39.5.617 [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Park, K.N. Kim, J.H. Kim, S. Kim, K.H. Lee, Y.J. Jeong, J.M. Park, Microstructural characterization of atomized UAlx powder for high-density LEU dispersion target fabrication, in Trans. Korean Nucl. Soc. Spring Meeting, Jeju, Korea, May 16–18, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  20. X. Iltis, J. Havette, V. Klosek, C. Onofri, K.H. Lee, J.H. Kim, Y.J. Jeong, M. Pasturel, H. Palancher, Microstructural characterization of atomized U3Si2 powders with different silicon contents (7.4–7.8 wt.%), J. Nucl. Mater. 573, 154141 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.154141 [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction, Phys. B: Condens. Matter. 192, 55 (1993), https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Bonnin, J.P. Wright, R. Tucoulou, H. Palancher, Impurity precipitation in atomized particles evidenced by nano X-ray diffraction computed tomography, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 084103 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4894009 [Google Scholar]
  23. M.M. Bretscher, J.E. Matos, Neutronic Performance of High-Density LEU Fuels in Water-Moderated and Water-Reflected Research Reactors, 1996, ANL/TD/RP-91011 Report, https://doi.org/10.2172/373923 [Google Scholar]
  24. A.D. Le Claire, I.J. Bear, The interdiffusion of uranium and aluminium, J. Nucl. Energy 2, 229 (1956), https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-3919(55)90039-5 [Google Scholar]
  25. L.S. Castelman, Layer growth during interdiffusion in the aluminium-uranium system, J. Nucl. Mater. 3, 1 (1961), https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(61)90173-8 [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Kniznik, P.R. Alonso, P.H. Gargano, G.H. Rubiolo, Simulation of UAl4 growth in an UAl3/Al diffusion couple, J. Nucl. Mater. 414, 309 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.056 [Google Scholar]
  27. A.S. Mukasyan, A.S. Rogachev, D.O. Moskovskikh, Zh.Z. Yermekova, Reactive spark plasma sintering of exothermic systems: A critical review, Ceram. Int. 48, 2988 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.10.207 [Google Scholar]
  28. Z.A. Munir, U. Anselmi-Tamburini, M. Ohyanagi, The effect of electric field and pressure on the synthesis and consolidation of materials: A review of the spark plasma sintering method, J. Mater. Sci. 41, 763 (2006), https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10853-006-6555-2 [Google Scholar]
  29. R. Li, T. Yuan, X. Liu, K. Zhou, Enhanced atomic diffusion of Fe-Al diffusion couple during spark plasma sintering, Scr. Mater. 110, 105 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60181-X [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. S. Deng, T. Yuan, R. Li, M. Zang, S. Xie, M. Wang, L. Li, J. Yuan, Q. Weng, Influence of electric current on interdiffusion kinetics of W-Ti system during spark plasma sintering, Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 75, 184 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2018.04.014 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.