| Issue |
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 5, 2019
Euratom Research and Training in 2019: the Awards collection
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 21 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2019053 | |
| Published online | 06 December 2019 | |
- J. Ródenas, I. Zarza, M.C. Burgos, A. Felipe, M.L. Sánchez-Mayoral, Developing a virtual reality application for training nuclear power plant operators: setting up a database containing dose rates in the refuelling plant, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 111, 173 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V.E. Whisker, A.J. Baratta, S. Yerrapathruni, J.I. Messner, T.S. Shaw, M.E. Warren, F.T. Johnson, Using immoof airtual environments to develop and visualize construction schedules for advanced nuclear power plants, Proc. ICAPP 3, 4 (2003) [Google Scholar]
- I. Heldal, H.C. Wijkmark, L. Pareto, Simulation and serious games for firefighter training: Challenges for effective use, NOKOBIT 24, 12 (2016) [Google Scholar]
- P.R. Desai, P.N. Desai, K.D. Ajmera, K. Mehta, A review paper on oculus rift-a virtual reality headset, arXiv:1408.1173 (2014) [Google Scholar]
- D.C. Niehorster, L. Li, M. Lappe, The accuracy and precision of position and orientation tracking in the HTC vive virtual reality system for scientific research, i-Perception 8 , 2041669517708205 (2017) [Google Scholar]
- P. Richard, G. Birebent, P. Coiffet, G. Burdea, D. Gomez, N. Langrana, Effect of frame rate and force feedback on virtual object manipulation, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 5, 95 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M.E. McCauley, T.J. Sharkey, Cybersickness: Perception of self-motion in virtual environments, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 1, 311 (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J.S. Webb, B.E.T. Rogoza, P.W. Bristol, J.A., Higgins, S.S. Talati, Y.Y. Chen, N.W. Konzen, U.S. Patent No. 9, 678, 566. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2017) [Google Scholar]
- L. Motion, Leap motion. San Francisco, CA, USA, 2015 [Google Scholar]
- D.A. Bowman, R.P. McMahan, Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Computer 40, 36 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Khademi, H. Mousavi Hondori, A. McKenzie, L. Dodakian, C.V. Lopes, S.C. Cramer, Free-hand interaction with leap motion controller for stroke rehabilitation, in Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, 2014, pp. 1663–1668 [Google Scholar]
- M.L. Ryan, Immersion vs. interactivity: Virtual reality and literary theory, SubStance 28, 110 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Hilfert, M. König, Low-cost virtual reality environment for engineering and construction, Visualization in Engineering 4, 2 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Jerald, P. Giokaris, D. Woodall, A. Hartbolt, A. Chandak, S. Kuntz, Developing virtual reality applications with Unity, in 2014 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) 1–3 (IEEE, 2014) [Google Scholar]
- T. Cakmak, H. Hager, T. Cakmak, H. Hager, Cyberith virtualizer: a locomotion device for virtual reality, in ACM SIGGRAPH 2014 Emerging Technologies (ACM, 2014), p. 6 [Google Scholar]
- J. Engel, J. Stückler, D. Cremers, J. Engel, J. Stückler, D. Cremers, Large-scale direct SLAM with stereo cameras, in 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 1935–1942 (IEEE, 2015) [Google Scholar]
- T. Gupta, H. Li, T. Gupta, H. Li, Indoor mapping for smart cities–An affordable approach: Using Kinect Sensor and ZED stereo camera, in 2017 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN) 1–8 (IEEE, 2017) [Google Scholar]
- I. Szőke, M.N. Louka, T.R. Bryntesen, J. Bratteli, S.T. Edvardsen, K.K. RøEitrheim, K. Bodor, Real-time 3D radiation risk assessment supporting simulation of work in nuclear environments, J. Radiol. Prot. 34, 389 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T.S. Mujber, T. Szecsi, M.S. Hashmi, Virtual reality applications in manufacturing process simulation, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 155, 1834 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Ottosson, Virtual reality in the product development process, J. Eng. Design 13, 159 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.