EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 4 (2018) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 4 (2018) 47 References
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 4, 2018
Special Issue on 4th International Workshop on Nuclear Data Covariances, October 2–6, 2017, Aix en Provence, France – CW2017
Article Number 47
Number of page(s) 7
Section Applied Covariances
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2018033
Published online 14 November 2018
  1. J.F. Martin et al., EPJ Web Conf., 146, 09010 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. L. San-Felice et al., Nucl. Tech. 184, 217 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Santamarina et al., The JEFF-3.1.1 Nuclear Data library, JEFF report, 22, OECD-NEA data bank, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Santamarina et al., Validation of the new code package APOLLO2.8 for accurate PWR neutronics calculations, in Proc. Int. Conf. Advances in Nuclear Fuel Management IV, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, USA, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  5. J.M. Ruggieri et al., Eranos2.1: the International Code System for GEN-IV fast reactor analysis in Proc. Int. Conf. ICAPP , Reno, Nevada, USA, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Tsilanizara et al., DARWIN: an evolution code system for a large range of applications, in Proc. Int. Conf. ICRS-9, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, 1999 [Google Scholar]
  7. J.F. Lebrat et al., Analysis of the TRAPU and DOUBLON irradiations in PHENIX for the experimental validation of the DARWIN package for fast reactors, in Proc. Int. Conf. GLOBAL, Paris, France, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Rizzo et al., EPJ Web Conf. 146, 09030 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. C. de Saint Jean et al., Status of CONRAD, a nuclear reaction analysis tool, in Proc. Int. Conf. Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Nice, France, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Archier et al., CONRAD evaluation code: development status and perspectives, in Proc. Int. Conf. Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, New-York, USA, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Bastian et al., AGS, a computer code for uncertainty propagation in time-of-flight cross section data, in Proc. Int. Conf. PHYSOR, Vancouver, Canada, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Brun et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 82, 151 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Lahaye et al., First verification and validation steps of MENDEL release 1.0 cycle code system, in Proc. Int. Conf. PHYSOR, Kyoto, Japan, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Ouisloumen et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 107, 189 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Privas et al., EPJ Web Conf. 106, 04015 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Habert et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 166, 276 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Noguere et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 172, 164 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. D.L. Smith, Probability, statistics, and data uncertainties in nuclear science and technology (American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois, 1991) [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Terranova, Covariance Evaluation for Nuclear Data of Interest to the Reactivity Loss Estimation of the Jules Horowitz Reactor, Ph.D. thesis report, Bologne University, Italy, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Archier et al., COMAC − Nuclear data covariance matrices library for reactor applications, in Proc. Int. Conf. PHYSOR, Kyoto, Japan, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Krivtchik, Analysis of uncertainty propagation in nuclear fuel cycle scenarios, Ph.D. thesis report, Grenoble University, France, 2014 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.