EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 4, 2018
Special Issue on 4th International Workshop on Nuclear Data Covariances, October 2–6, 2017, Aix en Provence, France – CW2017
Article Number 32
Number of page(s) 13
Section Covariance Evaluation Methodology
Published online 14 November 2018
  1. J.C. Holmes, A.I. Hawari, M. L. Zerkle, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 184, 84 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Noguere, J.P. Scotta, C. de Saint Jean, P. Archier, Ann. Nucl. Energy 104, 132 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Mattes, J. Keinert, Thermal Neutron Scattering Data for the moderator Materials H2O, D2O and ZrHx in ENDF-6 Format and as ACE Library for MCNP(X) Codes, International Atomic Energy Agency Report INDC(NDS) 0470 2005 [Google Scholar]
  4. J.I. Marquez Damian, J.R. Granada, D.C. Malaspina, Ann. Nucl. Energy 65, 280 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. G.L. Squires, Introduction to the Theory of Thermal Neutron Scattering (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1977) [Google Scholar]
  6. R.E. MacFarlane, New Thermal Scattering Files for ENDF/B-VI Release-2, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-12639-MS, 1994 [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Van Hove, Phys. Rev. 95, 249 (1954) [Google Scholar]
  8. D.W. Muir, R.M. Boicourt, A.C. Kahler, The NJOY Data Processing System, Version 2012, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-UR-12-27079, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Van Der Spoel et al., J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1701 (2005) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. M.A. Gonzalez, J.L.F. Abascal, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 224516 (2011) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. P.A. Egelstaff, P. Schofield, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 12, 260 (1962) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. V. Jaiswal et al., EPJ Web. Conf. 146, 13006 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. F. Real et al., J. Chem. Phys. 139, 114502 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A.G. Novikov et al., J. Struct. Chem. 31, 77 (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J.R. Beyster, J.C. Young, J.M. Neill, W.R. Mowry, Differential Neutron Scattering from Hydrogenous Materials, General Atomics Technical Report GA- 6295, 1965 [Google Scholar]
  16. K.N. Zaitsev et al., Sov. At. Energy 70, 238 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Heinloth, Z. Phys. 163, 218 (1961) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. S.B. Herdade, Progress Report on Nuclear Data in Brazil (June 1971–May 1972), International Atomic Energy Agency Report INDC(BZL)-4, 1973 [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Dritsa, A. Kostikas, Total Cross Section of Water at Room Temperature and 200 °C, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency Report EANDC(OR)-63L, 1967 [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Archier et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 488 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Bayes, An essay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chances, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 53, 370 (1763) [reprinted in Biometrik 45, 293 (1958)] [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Smith, in Probability, Statistics and Data Uncertainties in Nuclear Science and Technology (OECD Nuclear Energy Agency Committee Series, 1990), Vol. 4 [Google Scholar]
  23. C. de Saint Jean et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 161, 363 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. G. Noguere, P. Archier, C. de Saint Jean, B. Habert, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 172, 164 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. D.W. Muir, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 644, 55 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. B. Habert et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 166, 276 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. A.D. Carlson et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 110, 3215 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Cathalau et al., MISTRAL: an experimental program in the EOLE facility devoted to 100% MOX core physics, in Proceeding of International Conference on Physics of Reactors, PHYSOR 1996, Mito, Japan, 1996 [Google Scholar]
  29. E. Brun et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 82, 151 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. J.P. Scotta, G. Noguere, D. Bernard, J.I. Marquez Damian, A. Santamarina, EPJ Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2, 28 (2016) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Santamarina et al., The JEFF-3.1.1 Nuclear Data Library, JEFF Report 22, Nuclear Energy Agency, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  32. P. Archier et al., COMAC : Nuclear Data Covariance Matrices Library for reactor applications, in Proceeding of International Conference on Physics of Reactors, PHYSOR 2014, Kyoto, Japan, 2014 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.