Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 4, 2018
Article Number 4
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2018002
Published online 09 April 2018
  1. C. Chabert, D. Warin, J. Milot, A. Saturnin, A. Leudet, Impact of minor actinide transmutation options on interim storage and geological disposal, in IEMPT, 2012 (Prague) [Google Scholar]
  2. NEA, Minor actinides burning in thermal reactors (NEA, Paris, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Palmiotti, M. Salvatores, M. Assawaroongreungchot, Impact of the core minor actinide content on fast reactor reactivity coefficients, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48, 628 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. NEA, Homogeneous versus heterogeneous recycling of transuranics in fast nuclear reactors (NEA, Paris, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Kooyman, L. Buiron, G. Rimpault, Optimization of minor actinide-bearing radial blankets for heterogeneous transmutation in fast reactors, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 185, 335 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Klueh, J. Shingledecker, R. Swindeman, D. Hoelzer, Oxide dispersion-strengthened steels: A comparison of some commercial and experimental alloys, J. Nucl. Mater. 341, 103 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Le Flem, P. Gavoille, Y.D. Carlan, C. Bisor, J. Seran, Advanced steel claddings for SFRS: feedback and challenges, in GEMAT Final Workshop, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Waltar, A. Reynolds, Chapter 8 : Fuel pin and assembly design, in Fast Breeder Reactors (Pergamon Press, New York, 1981), pp. 251–312 [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Sciora, D. Blanchet, L. Buiron, B. Fontaine, M. Vanier, F. Varaine et al., Low void effect core design applied on 2400 MWth SFR reactor, in ICAPP 2011 (Nice, France) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Tommasi, M. Delpech, J. Grouiller, A. Zaetta, Long-lived waste transmutation in reactors, Nucl. Technol. 1, 133 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Kooyman, L. Buiron, B. Valentin, G. Rimpault, F. Delage, Pre-design optimization of a target assembly for minor actinides transmutation, IEMPT 2016 (San Diego) [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Rimpault, The ERANOS code and data system for fast reactor neutronic analyses, in PHYSOR, 2002 (Seoul) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Tsilanizara, C. Diop, B. Nimal, M. Detoc, L. Luneville, M. Chiron et al., DARWIN: An Evolution Code System for a Large Range, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. Suppl. 1, 845 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Marrel, B. Iooss, E. Volkova, An efficient methodology for modeling complex computer codes with Gaussian processes, Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 52, 4731 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. O. Fabbris, S. Dardour, P. Blaise, J.-H. Ferrasse, M. Saez, Surrogates based multi-criteria predesign methodology of sodium-cooled fast reactor cores − application to CFV-like cores, Nucl. Eng. Des. 305, 314 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Gaudier, URANIE: The CEA/DEN uncertainty and sensitivity platform, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2, 7660 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms : a comparative case study and the strengh Pareto approach, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 3, 257 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. C. de Saint Jean, J. Tommasi, F. Varaine, N. Schmidt, D. Plancq, Americium and curium heterogeneous transmutation in moderated S/A in the framework of CNE scenarios studies, in GLOBAL 2001 (Paris) [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Buiron et al., Heterogeneous minor actinides transmutation on a UO2 blanket and on (U, Pu)O2 fuel in sodium-cooled fast reactor. Assessment of core performances, in Proceedings of GLOBAL, 2009 (Paris) [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Chabert et al., Considerations on the industrial feasibility of scenarios with the progressive deployment of Pu multirecycling in SFRs in the french nuclear power fleet, in GLOBAL 2015 (Paris) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.