Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 3, 2017
Article Number 23
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2017017
Published online 10 July 2017
  1. J. Attiogbe, E. Aubonnet, L. De Maquille, P. De Moura, Y. Desnoyers, D. Dubot, B. Feret, P. Fichet, G. Granier, B. Iooss, J.-G. Nokhamzon, C. Ollivier Dehaye, L. Pillette-Cousin, A. Savary, Soil radiological characterisation methodology. CEA-R-6386 (Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), CEA Marcoule Center, Nuclear Energy Division, Radiochemistry and Processes Department, Analytical Methods Committee (CETAMA), France, 2014)
  2. P. Flynn, La gestion de la pandémie H1N1 : nécessité de plus de transparence, in AS/Soc 12 (Council of Europe, 2010)
  3. N. Pérot, B. Iooss, Quelques problématiques d'échantillonnage statistique pour le démantèlement d'installations nucléaires, in Conférence λμ16, Avignon, France, October 2008 (2008)
  4. B. Poncet, L. Petit, Method to assess the radionuclide inventory of irradiated graphite waste from gas-cooled reactors, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 298, 941 (2013) [CrossRef]
  5. B. Zaffora, M. Magistris, G. Saporta, F. La Torre, Statistical sampling applied to the radiological characterization of historical waste, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 2, 11 (2016) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  6. N. Jeannée, Y. Desnoyers, F. Lamadie, B. Iooss, Geostatistical sampling optimization of contaminated premises, in DEM – Decommissioning challenges: an industrial reality? Avignon, France, 2008 (2008)
  7. Y. Desnoyers, J.-P. Chilès, D. Dubot, N. Jeannée, J.-M. Idasiak, Geostatistics for radiological evaluation: study of structuring of extreme values, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 25, 1031 (2011) [CrossRef]
  8. A. Bechler, T. Romary, N. Jeannée, Y. Desnoyers, Geostatistical sampling optimization of contaminated facilities, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 27, 1967 (2013) [CrossRef]
  9. A.R. Brazzale, A.C. Davison, N. Reid, Applied asymptotics – case studies in small-sample statistics (Cambridge University Press, 2007) [CrossRef]
  10. P.-C. Pupion, G. Pupion, Méthodes statistiques applicables aux petits échantillons (Hermann, 2010)
  11. E.G. Schilling, D.V. Neubauer, Acceptance sampling in quality control, 2nd ed. (CRC Press, 2009)
  12. R.B. D'Agostino, M.A. Stephens, eds., Goodness-of-fit techniques (Dekker, 1986)
  13. G.J. Hahn, W.Q. Meeker, Statistical intervals. A guide for practitioners (Wiley-Interscience, 1991) [CrossRef]
  14. G. Blatman, B. Iooss, Confidence bounds on risk assessments − application to radiological contamination, in Proceedings of the PSAM11 ESREL 2012 Conference, Helsinki, Finland, June 2012 (2012), pp. 1223–1232
  15. R. Nelson, Probability, stochastic processes, and queuing theory: the mathematics of computer performance modeling (Springer, 1995) [CrossRef]
  16. G. Woo, Confidence bounds on risk assessments for underground nuclear waste repositories, Terra Res. 1, 79 (1988)
  17. L. Guttman, A distribution-free confidence interval for the mean, Ann. Math. Stat. 19, 410 (1948) [CrossRef]
  18. F. Pukelsheim, The three sigma rule, Am. Stat. 48, 88 (1994)
  19. D.F. Vysochanskii, Y.I. Petunin, Justification of the 3a rule for unimodal distribution, Theor. Probab. Math. Stat. 21, 25 (1980)
  20. S. Dharmadhikari, K. Joagdev, Unimodality, convexity, and applications (Academic Press, Inc., 1988)
  21. W.T. Nutt, G.B. Wallis, Evaluation of nuclear safety from the outputs of computer codes in the presence of uncertainties, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 83, 57 (2004) [CrossRef]
  22. D.B. Owen, Factors for one-sided tolerance limits and for variables sampling plans, SCR-607 (Sandia Corporation Monograph, 1963) [CrossRef]
  23. G.E.P. Box, D.R. Cox, An analysis of transformations, J. R. Stat. Soc. 26, 211 (1964)
  24. M. Lemaire, Structural reliability (Wiley, 2009) [CrossRef]
  25. I.R. Savage, Probability inequalities of the Tchebycheff type, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. B: Math. Math. Phys. 65B, 211 (1961) [CrossRef]
  26. S. Boucheron, G. Lugosi, S. Massart, Concentration inequalities: a nonasymptotic theory of independence (OUP, Oxford, 2013) [CrossRef]
  27. B. Meidell, Sur un problème du calcul des probabilités et les statistiques mathématiques, C. R. Acad. Sci. 175, 806 (1922)
  28. D. Van Dantzig, Une nouvelle généralisation de l'inégalité de Bienaymé (extrait d'une lettre à M.M. Fréchet), Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 12, 31 (1951), Available at: http://archive.numdam.org
  29. B. Efron, R.J. Tibshirani, An introduction to the bootstrap (Chapman & Hall, 1993) [CrossRef]
  30. H.A. David, H.N. Nagaraja, Order statistics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 2003) [CrossRef]
  31. C. Cannamela, J. Garnier, B. Iooss, Controlled stratification for quantile estimation, Ann. Appl. Stat. 2, 1554 (2008) [CrossRef]
  32. S.S. Wilks, Determination of sample sizes for setting tolerance limits, Ann. Math. Stat. 12, 91 (1941) [CrossRef]
  33. E. Hofer, Probabilistische unsicherheitsanalyse von ergeb-nissen umfangreicher rechenmodelle, in GRS-A-2002 (1993)
  34. A. de Crécy, P. Bazin, H. Glaeser, T. Skorek, J. Joucla, P. Probst, K. Fujioka, B.D. Chung, D.Y. Oh, M. Kyncl, R. Pernica, J. Macek, R. Meca, R. Macian, F. D'Auria, A. Petruzzi, L. Batet, M. Perez, F. Reventos, Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the LOFT L2-5 test: results of the BEMUSE programme, Nucl. Eng. Des. 12, 3561 (2008) [CrossRef]
  35. E. Zio, F. Di Maio, Bootstrap and order statistics for quantifying thermal-hydraulic code uncertainties in the estimation of safety margins, Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 9, 340164 (2008)
  36. W. Hoeffding, Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 13 (1963) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.