Open Access
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 2, 2016
Article Number 6
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 10 February 2016
  1. F.M. Vichi, L.F. Mello, in Energy: its use and the environment 3rd edn. (Thomson Learning, São Paulo, 2003) Chap. 19 [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Indriunas, HowStuffWorks: How it works controversy over the nuclear plants, 2008, [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Bertozzi et al., Safety assessment of radioactive disposal into geological formation (Commission of the European Community, Luxembourg, 1978) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Pritzker, J. Gassmann, Application of simplified reliability methods for risk assessment of nuclear waste repository, Nucl. Technol. 48, 289 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S.H. Chang, W.J. Cho, Risk analysis of radioactive waste repository based on the time dependent hazard rate, Radioactive Waste Manage. Nucl. Fuel Cycle 5, 63 (1984) [Google Scholar]
  6. B.L. Cohen, A generic probabilistic risk assessment for low level waste burial grounds, Nucl. Chem. Waste Manage. 5, 39 (1984) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. C.M. Malbrain, Risk assessment and the regulation of high level waste repository, D.Sc. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1984 [Google Scholar]
  8. P.O. Kim, W.J. Cho, S.H. Chang, Probabilistic safety assessment of low level wasted disposal system, Radioactive Waste Manage. Nucl. Fuel Cycle 10, 253 (1988) [Google Scholar]
  9. K.W.J. Han, C.H. Kang, C.H. Kim, Genetic safety assessment for LLW repository, in Anais do Joint International Waste Management Conference, 1991 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  10. T.W. Krishnamoorthy et al., Models for shallow land disposal of low and intermediate level radwastes, in Anais do Joint International Waste Management Conference, 1991 (1991), Vol. 1, p. 127 [Google Scholar]
  11. J.B. Garrick, The use of risk assessment to evaluate waste disposal facilities in the United States of America, Saf. Sci. 40, 135 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R.H. Little, J.S.S. Penfold, Preliminary safety assessment of concepts for a permanent waste repository at the Western Waste Management Facility, Summary Report, March 2003 [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Ene, Test case of the long-term preliminary performance assessment for the L&IL Radioactive Waste Repository Baita Bihor (ICRS, Madeira, Romania, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  14. V.B. Martins, A geographic information system and multicriteria analysis method for site selection of spent nuclear fuel disposal, PhD Thesis, COPPE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  15. IAEA, Arms control & verification: safeguards in a changing world (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1997) Vol. 39, n. 5, pp. 4–11 [Google Scholar]
  16. IAEA, Radioactive waste management glossary (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  17. IAEA, Qualitative acceptance criteria for radioactive wastes to be disposed of in deep geological formations (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1990) [Google Scholar]
  18. H.G. Costa, Support to Multicriteria Decision: AHP method (ABEPRO, Rio de Janeiro, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  19. F.A.E. Lozano, Selecting sites for tailings dams using hierarchical analysis method, Master's thesis, Polytechnic/USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  20. T.L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980) [Google Scholar]
  21. J.R. Emshoff, T.L. Saaty, Applications of the analytic hierarchy process to long range planning processes, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 10, 131 (1982) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Armacost, J. Hosseini, Identification of determinant attributes using the analytic hierarchy process, J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 22, 383 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. N. Bryson, Group decision-making and the analytic hierarchy process: exploring the consensus-relevant information content, Comput. Oper. Res. 23, 27 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S.R. Granemann, I.R. Gartner, Selection of financing for acquisition of aircraft: an application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Mag. Transp. 6, 18 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Figueiredo, I.R. Gartner, Planning for management actions for quality and productivity in urban transport, in Transportation in transformation II (Makron, São Paulo, 1999) [Google Scholar]
  26. I.R. Gartner, N. Casarotto Filho, B.H. Kopittke, A multi-criteria system to support the project analysis developing banks, Mag. Prod. Prod. CEREPBR 2, 75 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  27. A.T. Cruz Jr, M.M. Carvalho, Consumer voice obtaining: study of case on a Green Hotel, Production 13, 88 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. E. Bischoff, Studies using genetic algorithms for selecting access networks, Master's thesis in Electrical Engineering, Department of Electrical engineering, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 2008, p. 142 [Google Scholar]
  29. N.C. Dalkey, B. Brown, S. Cochran, The Delphi Method. III: Use of self rating to improve group estimates (The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, 1969) [Google Scholar]
  30. J.T.C. Wright, R.A. Giovinazzo, Delphi: a support tool to prospective planning, Notebooks Res. Management 1, 54 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  31. D.M. Georgoff, R.G. Murdick, Manager's guide to forecasting, Harv. Bus. Rev. 64, 110 (1986) [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Preble, Public sector use of the Delphi technique, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 23, 75 (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. U. Gupta, R. Clarke, Theory and application of Delphi technique: A Bibliography (1975-1994), Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 53, 185 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. S.C. Wheelwright, S. Makridakis, Forecasting methods for management 4th edn. (John Wiley, New York, 1985) [Google Scholar]
  35. H. Sackman, Delphi critique: expert opinion, forecasting, and group process (Lexington Book, Lexington, Massachusets, 1975) [Google Scholar]
  36. M.A. Linstone, M. Turoff, The Delphi method techniques and application (Wesley Publishing Company Inc, Addison, New York, 1975) [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Bacelo, K. Becker, A Support Tool and Discussion Deliberation Group, in Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Multimedia Systems and Hypermedia, São Carlos, 1997 (1997), pp. 119–130 [Google Scholar]
  38. A. Chauvet, Management methods: the Guide (Instituto Piaget, Lisbon, 1995) [Google Scholar]
  39. A. Goicoechea, D.R. Hansen, L. Duckstein, The Nominal Group Technique, in Multiobjective decision analysis with engineering and business applications (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982) pp. 361–363 [Google Scholar]
  40. B. Al-Kloub, T. Al-Shemmeri, A. Pearman, The role of weights in multi-criteria decision aid, and the ranking of water projects in Jordan, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 99, 278 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. S.H.B. Cassiani, L.P. Rodrigues, The Delphi technique and The Nominal Technical Group as collection strategies data from nursing research, Acta Paul. Enf. 9, 81 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  42. L.M. Jessup, D.A. Tansik, Decision making in an automated environment: the effect of anonymity and proximity with a Group Decision Support System, Decis. Sci. 2, 266 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. J.W. Wilkinson, Accounting and information systems (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991) [Google Scholar]
  44. R.S. Kaplan, A.A. Atkinson, in Advanced management accounting (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1989) pp. 473–496 [Google Scholar]
  45. R.S. Kaplan, A.A. Atkinson, in Advanced management accounting (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1989) pp. 719–740 [Google Scholar]
  46. IAEA, Selection factors for repositories of solid high-level and alpha-bearing wastes, International Atomic Energy Agency, Geological Formations, Technical Report Series, No. 177, Vienna, 1977 [Google Scholar]
  47. IAEA, Concepts and examples of safety analyses for radioactive waste repositories, International Atomic Energy Agency, Continental Geological Formations, Safety Series, No. 58, Vienna, 1983 [Google Scholar]
  48. IAEA, Safety principles and technical criteria for the underground disposal of high level radioactive wastes, International Atomic Energy Agency, Safety Series, No. 99, Vienna, 1989 [Google Scholar]
  49. K.P. Yoon, C.L. Hwang, Multi attribute decision making: an introduction (Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995) [Google Scholar]
  50. J. Malczewski, GIS and multicriteria decision analysis (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999) [Google Scholar]
  51. R.L. Keeney, H. Raiffa, R.F. Meyer, Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.