Open Access

Table 1

Comparison of TRIPOLI-4® with and without AMS for flux estimation in the bypass geometry (48 h calculations).

Simulation k (%) Number of batches Mean Relative error FOM Gain
Analog N/A 58 634 3.8554 × 10−10 13.50 6.9954 × 10−08 01
AMS
(Spatial)
0.01 68 4.3179 × 10−10 4.45 6.3347 × 10−07 09
0.05 793 4.1640 × 10−10 2.37 2.2742 × 10−06 32
0.1 1999 4.2156 × 10−10 1.74 4.1893 × 10−06 59
0.5 5378 4.1874 × 10−10 1.28 7.7867 × 10−06 111
1 6123 4.2000 × 10−10 1.25 8.1607 × 10−06 116
5 7910 4.1821 × 10−10 0.99 1.3139 × 10−05 187
10 7682 4.1321 × 10−10 1.04 1.1701 × 10−05 167
50 8661 4.1620 × 10−10 1.09 1.0657 × 10−05 152
AMS
(INIPOND)
0.01 105 4.2411 × 10−10 1.80 3.9036 × 10−06 55
0.05 818 4.1417 × 10−10 0.83 1.8636 × 10−05 266
0.1 2007 4.1624 × 10−10 0.62 3.3366 × 10−05 476
0.5 4859 4.1509 × 10−10 0.38 8.8830 × 10−05 1269
1 4572 4.1685 × 10−10 0.36 9.6031 × 10−05 1372
5 6029 4.1727 × 10−10 0.37 9.4906 × 10−05 1356
10 5970 4.1671 × 10−10 0.36 9.6938 × 10−05 1385
50 7690 4.1747 × 10−10 0.37 9.5076 × 10−05 1359

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.