Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 7, 2021
A tribute to Massimo Salvatores' scientific work
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2021003
Published online 18 March 2021
  1. A. Gandini, Study of the Sensitivity of Calculations for Fast Reactors Fueled with Pu239-U238 and U233-Th to Uncertainties in Nuclear Data, Technical Report ANL-6608 (1962) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Gandini, A generalized perturbation method for bi-linear functionals of the real and adjoint neutron fluxes, J. Nucl. Energy 21 , 755 (1967) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Gandini, M. Salvatores, G. Sena, I. Dal Bono, Perturbation analysis of fast reactors by the CIAP and GLOBPERT codes using improved perturbation methods, in ANL Conference on Fast Critical Experiments and their Analysis , October 1966, See: Proceed. ANL-7320, p. 304 [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Usachev, Atomnaya Energiya 15 , 472 (1963) [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Gandini, M. Petilli, AMARA: a code using the Lagrange's multipliers method for nuclear data adjustments, RT/FI(73)39, Comitato Nazionale Energia Nucleare (CNEN) (1973) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Gandini, A method of correlation of burn-up measurements for physics prediction of fast power reactor life, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 38 , 1 (1969). Corrigendum, NSE 41, 319 (1970) [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Gandini, Time-dependent generalized perturbation methods for burn-up analysis, RT/FI(75)4, Comitato Nazionale Energia Nucleare (CNEN) (1975) Also NEACRP-L-130 [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Gandini, Nuclear data and integral measurements correlation for fast reactors. Part 1: statistical formulation, Technical Report RT/FI(73)5, Comitato Nazionale Energia Nucleare (CNEN) (1973) [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Gandini, Nuclear data and integral measurements correlation for fast reactors. Part 2: review of methods, Technical Report RT/FI(73)22, Comitato Nazionale Energia Nucleare (CNEN) (1973) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Gandini, M. Salvatores, Nuclear data and integral measurements correlation for fast reactors. Part 3: the consistent method, Technical Report RT/FI(74)3, Comitato Nazionale Energia Nucleare (CNEN) (1974) [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Gandini, Generalized perturbation theory for nonlinear systems from the importance conservation principle, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 77 , 316 (1981) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Gandini, L.A. Balblidia, J.M. Kallfeltz, V.A. Perone, Taylor series expansion via generalized perturbation theory for peak power investigations, Am. Nucl. Soc. Trans. 39 , 957 (1981) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Gandini, M. Salvatores, G. Sena, Use of generalized perturbation methods for optimization of reactor design, J. Nucl. Energy 23 , 469 (1969) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Gandini, G. Palmiotti, M. Salvatores, Equivalent generalized perturbation theory (EGPT), Ann. Nucl. Energy 13 , 109 (1986) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Gandini, Sensitivity analysis of source driven subcritical systems by the HGPT methodology, Ann. Nucl. Energy 24 , 1241 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Gandini, Evolutionary mobile fuel reactor, Seminar on Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems Toward Zero Release of Radioactive Wastes, Fujihara Foundation of Science, Susono, Japan (2000), Also: pp. 661–671 in Susono Seminar Proceedings published in Progress in Nuclear Energy, 40/3-4 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Gandini, M. Salvatores, The physics of subcritical multiplying systems, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 39 , 673 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Gandini, Importance and sensitivity analysis in assessing system reliability, IEEE Trans. Reliab. 39 , 61 (1990) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Gandini, Hot point detection method, Ann. Nucl. Energy 38 , 2843 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Gandini, M. Lezziero, V. Peluso, F. Pisacane, Hot spot identification by sensitivity analysis and probabilistic inference methods: demonstration exercise, Ann. Nucl. Energy 50 , 175 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  21. E.P. Wigner, Effect of small perturbations on pile period, Chicago Report CP-G-3048 (1945) [Google Scholar]
  22. B.B. Kadomtzev, Dokl. An. USSR 113 , 3 (1957) [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Lewins, Importance, the adjoint function (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1965) [Google Scholar]
  24. D.G. Cacuci, E.M. Oblow, J.H. Marable, C.F. Weber, Nucl.Sci. Eng. 75 , 88 (1880) [Google Scholar]
  25. E.M. Greenspan, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 57 , 250 (1975) [Google Scholar]
  26. A.C. Marques Alvim et al., Application of the heuristically based GPT theory to thermohydraulic problems, Proceedings of II Congresso Geral de Energia Nuclear, Rio de Janeiro, 24–29 April , 1988 [Google Scholar]
  27. L.A. Linsternik, V.J. Sobelev, Elements of functional analysis (Ungar, New York, 1972) [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Gandini, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 35 , 141 (1969) [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Gandini, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 59 , 60 (1976) [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Gandini, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 77 , 316 (1981) [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Gandini, Generalized perturbation theory methods. A heuristic approach, in: J. Lewins, M. Becker (Eds.), Advances in Nuclear Science and Technology , Vol. 19, Plenum Press, New York, 1987, p. 205 [Google Scholar]
  32. D.G. Cacuci, On perturbation theory and reactor kinetics: from Wigner's pile period to accelerator driven systems, Key Note Speech, Physor 2002, Seoul, October 7–10 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Gandini, Advances of sensitivity analysis by the HGPT methodology, International Conference on Mathematics and Computation, Reactor Physics and Environmental Analysis in Nuclear Applications, Madrid , 27–30 September 1999 [Google Scholar]
  34. A.M. Baudron, G.B. Bruna, A. Gandini, J.-J. Lautard, S. Monti, G. Pizzigati, Ann. Nucl. Energy 25 , 1383 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  35. L.S. Pontryagin et al., The mathematical theory of optimal process (Interscience, New York, 1962) [Google Scholar]
  36. H. Soodak, The science and engineering of nuclear power (United Nations, New York, 1948) [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Gandini, Ann. Nucl. Energy 29 , 623 (2002) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.