EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 1 (2015) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 1 (2015) 18 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 1, 2015
Article Number 18
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/e2015-50046-1
Published online 18 December 2015
  1. H. Ezure, Estimation of most probable power distribution in BWRs by least squares method using in-core measurements, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 25, 731 (1988) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Kalnay, Atmospheric modeling, data assimilation and predictability (Cambridge University Press, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  3. S.M. Uppala et al., The ERA-40 re-analysis, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131, 2961 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Tarantola, Inverse problem: theory methods for data fitting and parameter estimation (Elsevier, 1987) [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Bouttier, P. Courtier, Data assimilation concepts and methods, Meteorological training course lecture series, ECMWF, 1999 [Google Scholar]
  6. O. Talagrand, Assimilation of observations, an introduction, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn 75, 191 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Massart, S. Buis, P. Erhard, G. Gacon, Use of 3DVAR and Kalman filter approaches for neutronic state and parameter estimation in nuclear reactors, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 155, 409 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Bouriquet, J.-P. Argaud, P. Erhard, S. Massart, A. Ponçot, S. Ricci, O. Thual, Differential influence of instruments in nuclear core activity evaluation by data assimilation, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 626–627, 97 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Bouriquet, J.-P. Argaud, P. Erhard, S. Massart, A. Ponçot, S. Ricci, O. Thual, Robustness of nuclear core activity reconstruction by data assimilation, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 629, 282 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Bouriquet, J.-P. Argaud, R. Cugnart, Optimal design of measurement network for neautronic activity field reconstruction by data assimilation, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 664, 117 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Blaise, D. Bernard, C. de Saint Jean, N. dos Santos, P. Leconte, A. Santamarina, J. Tommasi, J.-F. Vidal, The uncertainty quantification for complex neutronics code packages: issues on modern nuclear data assimilation and transposition to future nuclear systems, in ASME 2011 PVP-MF Symposium on risk-informed monitoring, modeling, and operation of aging systems Baltimore, Maryland, USA, July 17–22, 2011 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  12. D.W. Muir, The contribution of individual correlated parameters to the uncertainty of integral quantities, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 644, 55 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Bouriquet, J.-P. Argaud, Best linear unbiased estimation of the nuclear masses, Ann. Nucl. Energy 38, 1863 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Santamarina, C. Collignon, C. Garat, French calculation schemes for light water reactor analysis, in PHYSOR 2004 - The Physics of Fuel Cycles and Advanced Nuclear Systems: Global Developments Chicago, Illinois, April 25–29, 2004, on CD-ROM, American Nuclear Society, Lagrange Park, IL, 2004 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Matheron, La théorie des variables régionalisées et ses applications, Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie Mathématique de l’ENSMP, Fontainebleau, Fascicule 5, 1970 [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Marcotte, Géologie et géostatistique minières (lecture notes), 2008 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.