Issue |
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 7, 2021
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 1 | |
Number of page(s) | 12 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2020021 | |
Published online | 20 January 2021 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2020021
Regular Article
A simplified analysis of the Chernobyl accident
1
CEA/INSTN, Gif sur Yvette 91191, France
2
Institut Franco-Chinois de l'Energie Nucléaire, Sun Yat-sen University, 519082 Zhuhai Campus, Guangdong Province,
P.R. China
* e-mail: Bertrand.mercier@cea.fr
Received:
13
July
2020
Received in final form:
3
December
2020
Accepted:
21
December
2020
Published online: 20 January 2021
We show with simplified numerical models, that for the kind of RBMK operated in Chernobyl:
The core was unstable due to its large size and to its weak power counter-reaction coefficient, so that the power of the reactor was not easy to control even with an automatic system.
Xenon oscillations could easily be activated.
When there was xenon poisoning in the upper half of the core, the safety rods were designed in such a way that, at least initially, they were increasing (and not decreasing) the core reactivity.
This reactivity increase has been sufficient to lead to a very high pressure increase in a significant amount of liquid water in the fuel channels thus inducing a strong propagating shock wave leading to a failure of half the pressure tubes at their junction with the drum separators.
The depressurization phase (flash evaporation) following this failure has produced, after one second, a significant decrease of the water density in half the pressure tubes and then a strong reactivity accident due to the positive void effect reactivity coefficient.
We evaluate the fission energy released by the accident
© B. Mercier et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.