EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 12 (2026) EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol., 12 (2026) 19 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 12, 2026
Article Number 19
Number of page(s) 19
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2026009
Published online 16 June 2026
  1. T. Bahadir, S.O. Lindhal, Studsvik’s next generation nodal code SIMULATE-5, in Advances in Nuclear Fuel Management IV (ANFM 2009), Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, USA, April 12–15, 2009 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Hobson, H.-W. Bolloni, K.-A. Breith, A. Dall'Osso, R. van Geemert, H. Haase, B. Hartmann, M. Leberig, D. Porsch, B. Pothet, M. Riedmann, G. Sieber, D. Tomatis, ARTEMIS core simulator: latest developments, in SNA + MC 2013 – Joint International Conference on Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications + Monte Carlo (2014), pp. 02309. https://doi.org/10.1051/snamc/201402309 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Calloo, D. Couyras, F. Févotte, M. Guillo, C. Brosselard, B. Bouriquet, A. Dubois, E. Girardi, F. Hoareau, M. Fliscounakis, H. Leroyer, E. Noblat, Y. Pora, L. Plagne, A. Ponçot, N. Schwartz, COCAGNE: EDF new neutronic core code for ANDROMÈDE calculation chain, in M &C 2017 – International Conference on Mathematics & Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science & Engineering, Jeju, Korea, April 16–20, 2017, on USB (2017) (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Detkina, D. Litskevitch, A. Peakman, B. Merk, Criticality analysis for BWR spent fuel based on the burnup credit evaluation from full core simulations, Appl. Sci. 11, 1498 (2021). https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/4/1498 [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Kromar, A.T. Godfrey, Determination of the spent fuel decay heat with the VERA core simulator, Front. Energy Res. 10, 1046506 (2022). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2022.1046506 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, M. Pecchia, Consistent criticality and radiation studies of Swiss spent nuclear fuel: the CS2M approach, J. Hazard. Mater. 357, 384 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.05.041 [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Berry, A. Vasiliev, D. Rochman, M. Hursin, M. Frankl, H. Ferroukhi, Application of the PSI cycle check-up methodology for full-core Monte Carlo simulations verified using pin power estimates and validated for hot zero power conditions, Ann. Nucl. Energy 211, 110939 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2024.110939 [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Meunier, M. Hursin, Modeling, verification and validation of multiple PWR depletion cycles with DRAGON and PARCS, Ann. Nucl. Energy 219, 111427 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111427 [Google Scholar]
  9. E.E. Davidson, A.T. Godfrey, K.E. Royston, T.M. Pandya, S.C. Henderson, T.M. Evans, Validation of light water reactor ex-core calculations with VERA, Nucl. Technol. 208, 794 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1957660 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Seidl, P. Schillebeeckx, D. Rochman, Note on the potential to increase the accuracy of source term calculations for spent nuclear fuel, Front. Energy Res. 11, 1143312 (2023). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1143312 [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Ahnert, J.M. Aragones, F. Merino, V.K. Jain, V. Jagannathan, R.P. Jain, R.D.S. Yadav, M. Matausek, N. Marinkovic, E.Z. Mueller, G. Ball, D.L. Vogel, H. Ras, B. Petrovic, T. Smuc, N. Urli, M. Turgut, T. Turker, S. Taylan, A. Aytekin, U. Adalioglu, D. Pevec, In-core fuel management code package validation for PWRs. Technical Report, TECDOC-815, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 1995 [Google Scholar]
  12. K.S. Smith, S. Tarves, T. Bahadir, R. Ferrer, Benchmarks for quantifying fuel reactivity depletion uncertainty. Technical Report, 1022909, EPRI, Palo Alto, USA, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Tarves, T. Bahadir, R. Ferrer, Benchmarks for quantifying fuel reactivity depletion uncertainty – Revision 1. Technical Report, 3002010613, EPRI, Palo Alto, USA, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Sykora, Testing the EPRI reactivity depletion decrement uncertainty methods. Technical Report, Master of Science in Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 2015. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/103653/953277565-MIT.pdf [Google Scholar]
  15. V.N. Kucukboyaci, EPRI depletion benchmark calculations using PARAGON, Ann. Nucl. Energy 81, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.03.010 [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, L. Berry, Bias and uncertainty estimates for in-core LWR reaction rate distributions, EPJ/N, submitted in 2026 [Google Scholar]
  17. R.M. Ferrer, J.D. Rhodes, Extension of linear source MOC methodology to anisotropic scattering in CASMO5, in International Conference on Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR 2014), September 28–October 3, 2014, Kyoto, Japan, no. JAEA-Conf 2014-003 (2014). https://jopss.jaea.go.jp/search/servlet/search?5049377 [Google Scholar]
  18. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project Handbook, 2020. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/data/7e0ebc50-en [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Michel-Sendis, I. Gauld, J. Martinez, C. Alejano, M. Bossant, D. Boulanger, O. Cabellos, V. Chrapciak, J. Conde, I. Fast, M. Gren, K. Govers, M. Gysemans, V. Hannstein, F. Havluj, M. Hennebach, G. Hordosy, G. Ilas, R. Kilger, R. Mills, D. Mountford, P. Ortego, G. Radulescu, M. Rahimi, A. Ranta-Aho, K. Rantamäki, B. Ruprecht, N. Soppera, M. Stuke, K. Suyama, S. Tittelbach, C. Tore, S.V. Winckel, A. Vasiliev, T. Watanabe, T. Yamamoto, T. Yamamoto, SFCOMPO-2.0: an OECD NEA database of spent nuclear fuel isotopic assays, reactor design specifications, and operating data, Ann. Nucl. Energy 110, 779 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.07.022 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. D.W. Hogg, Data analysis recipes: choosing the binning for a histogram, 2008. https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.4820 [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, A. Dokhane, H. Ferroukhi, Uncertainties for Swiss LWR spent nuclear fuels due to nuclear data, EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 4, 6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2018005 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, A. Dokhane, H. Ferroukhi, M. Hursin, Nuclear data uncertainties for Swiss BWR spent nuclear fuel characteristics, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 233 (2020). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00258-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. American Nuclear Society Standards Committee Working Group ANS-8.24, Validation of Neutron Transport Methods for Nuclear Criticality Safety Calculations. Technical Report, ANSI/ANS-8.24-2017, American Nuclear Society, 2017 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.