| Issue |
EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol.
Volume 12, 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 16 | |
| Number of page(s) | 16 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2026012 | |
| Published online | 11 June 2026 | |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2026012
Regular Article
A comparative study of production methods for nuclear-grade boron carbide powder
1
Georgian Institute of Stable Isotopes, 1 Alio Mirtskhulava St., Tbilisi 0119, Georgia
2
Jiangsu Zhengbonuo Technology Development Co. Ltd., 8 Fujin Road, Taixing, Jiangsu, 225400, P.R. China
3
Georgian Technical University, 77 Kostava St., Tbilisi 0175, Georgia
* e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
21
November
2025
Received in final form:
13
April
2026
Accepted:
23
April
2026
Published online: 11 June 2026
Abstract
Two industrial-scale methods for synthesizing nuclear-grade boron carbide (B4C) powder have been investigated and compared: direct synthesis from elements and carbothermal reduction. A series of experiments using different boron (isotopically enriched 10B and 11B) and carbon sources (carbon black and graphite powder) has been conducted. The synthesized powders have been analyzed for their chemical composition, purity, morphology, and particle size distribution. It was found that the carbothermal reduction, while producing chemically pure boron carbide, results in significant loss of boron due to the volatility of boron oxides, leading to a boron-deficient product with elongated, platelet-shaped particles. In contrast, direct synthesis from elements enables precise control over the B/C ratio and produces powders with polyhedral particles. However, the products of the direct synthesis method are often contaminated with impurities from the raw boron material, requiring subsequent mechanochemical treatment to achieve nuclear-grade purity. Both methods face challenges with morphological heterogeneity when scaled up, primarily due to temperature gradients within large powder volumes, which can also be addressed by mechanochemical treatment. As for loss of isotopic boron in the carbothermal process, it is 25–35%, while in direct synthesis it is 5–6%.
© Z. Mestvirishvili et al., Published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.
